Security assessments indicate that CVE-2025-21730 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.
Status: Analyzed
Last updated: 🕐 23 Oct 2025, 13:05 UTC
Originally published on: 🕑 27 Feb 2025, 02:15 UTC
Time between publication and last update: 238 days
CVSS Release: version 3
nvd@nist.gov
Primary
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVE-2025-21730: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: rtw89: avoid to init mgnt_entry list twice when WoWLAN failed If WoWLAN failed in resume flow, the rtw89_ops_add_interface() triggered without removing the interface first. Then the mgnt_entry list init again, causing the list_empty() check in rtw89_chanctx_ops_assign_vif() useless, and list_add_tail() again. Therefore, we have added a check to prevent double adding of the list. rtw89_8852ce 0000:01:00.0: failed to check wow status disabled rtw89_8852ce 0000:01:00.0: wow: failed to check disable fw ready rtw89_8852ce 0000:01:00.0: wow: failed to swap to normal fw rtw89_8852ce 0000:01:00.0: failed to disable wow rtw89_8852ce 0000:01:00.0: failed to resume for wow -110 rtw89_8852ce 0000:01:00.0: MAC has already powered on i2c_hid_acpi i2c-ILTK0001:00: PM: acpi_subsys_resume+0x0/0x60 returned 0 after 284705 usecs list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (ffff9d9719d82228), but was ffff9d9719f96030. (prev=ffff9d9719f96030). ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:34! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 6918 Comm: kworker/u8:19 Tainted: G U O Hardware name: Google Anraggar/Anraggar, BIOS Google_Anraggar.15217.514.0 03/25/2024 Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid_or_report+0x9f/0xb0 Code: e8 56 89 ff ff 0f 0b 48 c7 c7 3e fc e0 96 48 89 c6 e8 45 89 ff ... RSP: 0018:ffffa51b42bbbaf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000075 RBX: ffff9d9719d82ab0 RCX: 13acb86e047a4400 RDX: 3fffffffffffffff RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000ffffdfff RBP: ffffa51b42bbbb28 R08: ffffffff9768e250 R09: 0000000000001fff R10: ffffffff9765e250 R11: 0000000000005ffd R12: ffff9d9719f95c40 R13: ffff9d9719f95be8 R14: ffff9d97081bfd78 R15: ffff9d9719d82060 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9d9a6fb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007e7d029a4060 CR3: 0000000345e38000 CR4: 0000000000750ee0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body+0x68/0xb0 ? die+0xaa/0xd0 ? do_trap+0x9f/0x170 ? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x9f/0xb0 ? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x9f/0xb0 ? handle_invalid_op+0x69/0x90 ? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x9f/0xb0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x3c/0x50 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? __list_add_valid_or_report+0x9f/0xb0 rtw89_chanctx_ops_assign_vif+0x1f9/0x210 [rtw89_core cbb375c44bf28564ce479002bff66617a25d9ac1] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xa0/0xf0 rtw89_ops_assign_vif_chanctx+0x4b/0x90 [rtw89_core cbb375c44bf28564ce479002bff66617a25d9ac1] drv_assign_vif_chanctx+0xa7/0x1f0 [mac80211 6efaad16237edaaea0868b132d4f93ecf918a8b6] ieee80211_reconfig+0x9cb/0x17b0 [mac80211 6efaad16237edaaea0868b132d4f93ecf918a8b6] ? __pfx_wiphy_resume+0x10/0x10 [cfg80211 572d03acaaa933fe38251be7fce3b3675284b8ed] ? dev_printk_emit+0x51/0x70 ? _dev_info+0x6e/0x90 wiphy_resume+0x89/0x180 [cfg80211 572d03acaaa933fe38251be7fce3b3675284b8ed] ? __pfx_wiphy_resume+0x10/0x10 [cfg80211 572d03acaaa933fe38251be7fce3b3675284b8ed] dpm_run_callback+0x37/0x1e0 device_resume+0x26d/0x4b0 ? __pfx_dpm_watchdog_handler+0x10/0x10 async_resume+0x1d/0x30 async_run_entry_fn+0x29/0xd0 worker_thread+0x397/0x970 kthread+0xed/0x110 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x38/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK>
The exploitability of CVE-2025-21730 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).
CVE-2025-21730 presents an accessible attack vector with minimal effort required. Restricting access controls and implementing security updates are critical to reducing exploitation risks.
A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.
Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.
Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.
Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-21730, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.
Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-21730, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.
The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.
EPSS Score: 0.045% (probability of exploit)
EPSS Percentile: 18.4%
(lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 81.6% of others.
NVD-CWE-noinfo
Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.