CVE-2022-49775 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2022-49775
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress
Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity:
    Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
  • Attack Vector:
    Attack Vector Under Analysis
  • Privileges Required: None
    No authentication is required for exploitation.
  • Scope:
    Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2022-49775 Details

Status: Awaiting Analysis

Last updated: 🕜 02 May 2025, 13:53 UTC
Originally published on: 🕒 01 May 2025, 15:16 UTC

CVSS Release:

CVE-2022-49775 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2022-49775: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: cdg: allow tcp_cdg_release() to be called multiple times Apparently, mptcp is able to call tcp_disconnect() on an already disconnected flow. This is generally fine, unless current congestion control is CDG, because it might trigger a double-free [1] Instead of fixing MPTCP, and future bugs, we can make tcp_disconnect() more resilient. [1] BUG: KASAN: double-free in slab_free mm/slub.c:3539 [inline] BUG: KASAN: double-free in kfree+0xe2/0x580 mm/slub.c:4567 CPU: 0 PID: 3645 Comm: kworker/0:7 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-02734-g0326074ff465 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:317 [inline] print_report.cold+0x2ba/0x719 mm/kasan/report.c:433 kasan_report_invalid_free+0x81/0x190 mm/kasan/report.c:462 ____kasan_slab_free+0x18b/0x1c0 mm/kasan/common.c:356 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:200 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1759 [inline] slab_free_freelist_hook+0x8b/0x1c0 mm/slub.c:1785 slab_free mm/slub.c:3539 [inline] kfree+0xe2/0x580 mm/slub.c:4567 tcp_disconnect+0x980/0x1e20 net/ipv4/tcp.c:3145 __mptcp_close_ssk+0x5ca/0x7e0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2327 mptcp_do_fastclose net/mptcp/protocol.c:2592 [inline] mptcp_worker+0x78c/0xff0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2627 process_one_work+0x991/0x1610 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0x665/0x1080 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x2e4/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:306 </TASK> Allocated by task 3671: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:38 kasan_set_track mm/kasan/common.c:45 [inline] set_alloc_info mm/kasan/common.c:437 [inline] ____kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:516 [inline] ____kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:475 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0xa9/0xd0 mm/kasan/common.c:525 kmalloc_array include/linux/slab.h:640 [inline] kcalloc include/linux/slab.h:671 [inline] tcp_cdg_init+0x10d/0x170 net/ipv4/tcp_cdg.c:380 tcp_init_congestion_control+0xab/0x550 net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c:193 tcp_reinit_congestion_control net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c:217 [inline] tcp_set_congestion_control+0x96c/0xaa0 net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c:391 do_tcp_setsockopt+0x505/0x2320 net/ipv4/tcp.c:3513 tcp_setsockopt+0xd4/0x100 net/ipv4/tcp.c:3801 mptcp_setsockopt+0x35f/0x2570 net/mptcp/sockopt.c:844 __sys_setsockopt+0x2d6/0x690 net/socket.c:2252 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2263 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2260 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xba/0x150 net/socket.c:2260 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Freed by task 16: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:38 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 mm/kasan/common.c:45 kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30 mm/kasan/generic.c:370 ____kasan_slab_free mm/kasan/common.c:367 [inline] ____kasan_slab_free+0x166/0x1c0 mm/kasan/common.c:329 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:200 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1759 [inline] slab_free_freelist_hook+0x8b/0x1c0 mm/slub.c:1785 slab_free mm/slub.c:3539 [inline] kfree+0xe2/0x580 mm/slub.c:4567 tcp_cleanup_congestion_control+0x70/0x120 net/ipv4/tcp_cong.c:226 tcp_v4_destroy_sock+0xdd/0x750 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2254 tcp_v6_destroy_sock+0x11/0x20 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:1969 inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x196/0x440 net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:1157 tcp_done+0x23b/0x340 net/ipv4/tcp.c:4649 tcp_rcv_state_process+0x40e7/0x4990 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6624 tcp_v6_do_rcv+0x3fc/0x13c0 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:1525 tcp_v6_rcv+0x2e8e/0x3830 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:1759 ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x2db/0x1950 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:439 ip6_input_finish+0x14c/0x2c0 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:484 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:302 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:296 [inline] ip6_input+0x9c/0xd ---truncated---

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2022-49775

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2022-49775 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2022-49775

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2022-49775.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2022-49775, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2022-49775, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2022-49775 does not compromise confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2022-49775 does not impact data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2022-49775 does not affect system availability.

CVE-2022-49775 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2022-49775: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-4485 – A vulnerability has been found in itsourcecode Gym Management System 1.0 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the...
  • CVE-2025-4484 – A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in itsourcecode Gym Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /a...
  • CVE-2025-4483 – A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in itsourcecode Gym Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown...
  • CVE-2025-4482 – A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Project Worlds Student Project Allocation System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unkn...
  • CVE-2025-1993 – IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container 8.1, 8.2, 9.0, 9.1, 9.2, 10.0, 10.1, 11.0, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, 11.6, 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 12....