CVE-2022-49452 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2022-49452
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

Attack Complexity:
Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
Attack Vector:
Attack Vector Under Analysis
Privileges Required: None
No authentication is required for exploitation.
Scope:
Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
User Interaction: None
No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2022-49452 Details

Status: Received on 26 Feb 2025, 07:01 UTC

Published on: 26 Feb 2025, 07:01 UTC

CVSS Release:

CVE-2022-49452 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2022-49452: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dpaa2-eth: retrieve the virtual address before dma_unmap The TSO header was DMA unmapped before the virtual address was retrieved and then used to free the buffer. This meant that we were actually removing the DMA map and then trying to search for it to help in retrieving the virtual address. This lead to a invalid virtual address being used in the kfree call. Fix this by calling dpaa2_iova_to_virt() prior to the dma_unmap call. [ 487.231819] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffd9807000008 (...) [ 487.354061] Hardware name: SolidRun LX2160A Honeycomb (DT) [ 487.359535] pstate: a0400005 (NzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 487.366485] pc : kfree+0xac/0x304 [ 487.369799] lr : kfree+0x204/0x304 [ 487.373191] sp : ffff80000c4eb120 [ 487.376493] x29: ffff80000c4eb120 x28: ffff662240c46400 x27: 0000000000000001 [ 487.383621] x26: 0000000000000001 x25: ffff662246da0cc0 x24: ffff66224af78000 [ 487.390748] x23: ffffad184f4ce008 x22: ffffad1850185000 x21: ffffad1838d13cec [ 487.397874] x20: ffff6601c0000000 x19: fffffd9807000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 487.405000] x17: ffffb910cdc49000 x16: ffffad184d7d9080 x15: 0000000000004000 [ 487.412126] x14: 0000000000000008 x13: 000000000000ffff x12: 0000000000000000 [ 487.419252] x11: 0000000000000004 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffffad184d7d927c [ 487.426379] x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000ffffffd1d x6 : ffff662240a94900 [ 487.433505] x5 : 0000000000000003 x4 : 0000000000000009 x3 : ffffad184f4ce008 [ 487.440632] x2 : ffff662243eec000 x1 : 0000000100000100 x0 : fffffc0000000000 [ 487.447758] Call trace: [ 487.450194] kfree+0xac/0x304 [ 487.453151] dpaa2_eth_free_tx_fd.isra.0+0x33c/0x3e0 [fsl_dpaa2_eth] [ 487.459507] dpaa2_eth_tx_conf+0x100/0x2e0 [fsl_dpaa2_eth] [ 487.464989] dpaa2_eth_poll+0xdc/0x380 [fsl_dpaa2_eth]

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2022-49452

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2022-49452 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2022-49452

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2022-49452.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2022-49452, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2022-49452, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

Confidentiality: None
CVE-2022-49452 does not compromise confidentiality.
Integrity: None
CVE-2022-49452 does not impact data integrity.
Availability: None
CVE-2022-49452 does not affect system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.043% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 12.0% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 88.0% of others.

CVE-2022-49452 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2022-49452: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-3799 – A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in WCMS 11. Affected is an unknown function of the file app/controllers/AnonymousContr...
CVE-2025-3798 – A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in WCMS 11. This issue affects the function sub of the file app/admin/AdvadminCon...
CVE-2025-3661 – The SB Chart block plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘className’ parameter in all versions up to, and inclu...
CVE-2025-3404 – The Download Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the savePackage func...
CVE-2021-4455 – The Wordpress Plugin Smart Product Review plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in all v...