CVE-2013-0422 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2013-0422
Vulnerability Scoring

9.8
/10
Critical Risk

As a catastrophic security flaw, CVE-2013-0422 has severe implications, demanding immediate intervention.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2013-0422 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕗 10 Feb 2025, 20:15 UTC
Originally published on: 🕤 10 Jan 2013, 21:55 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 4413 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE-2013-0422 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2013-0422: Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using the public getMBeanInstantiator method in the JmxMBeanServer class to obtain a reference to a private MBeanInstantiator object, then retrieving arbitrary Class references using the findClass method, and (2) using the Reflection API with recursion in a way that bypasses a security check by the java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.Lookup.checkSecurityManager method due to the inability of the sun.reflect.Reflection.getCallerClass method to skip frames related to the new reflection API, as exploited in the wild in January 2013, as demonstrated by Blackhole and Nuclear Pack, and a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4681 and CVE-2012-3174. NOTE: some parties have mapped the recursive Reflection API issue to CVE-2012-3174, but CVE-2012-3174 is for a different vulnerability whose details are not public as of 20130114. CVE-2013-0422 covers both the JMX/MBean and Reflection API issues. NOTE: it was originally reported that Java 6 was also vulnerable, but the reporter has retracted this claim, stating that Java 6 is not exploitable because the relevant code is called in a way that does not bypass security checks. NOTE: as of 20130114, a reliable third party has claimed that the findClass/MBeanInstantiator vector was not fixed in Oracle Java 7 Update 11. If there is still a vulnerable condition, then a separate CVE identifier might be created for the unfixed issue.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2013-0422

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2013-0422 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2013-0422

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2013-0422 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2013-0422, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2013-0422, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2013-0422 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: High
    CVE-2013-0422 could allow unauthorized modifications to data, potentially affecting system reliability and trust.
  • Availability: High
    CVE-2013-0422 can disrupt system operations, potentially causing complete denial of service (DoS).

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 93.208% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 99.32% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 0.6800000000000068% of others.

CVE-2013-0422 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-284

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Embedding Scripts within Scripts CAPEC-19 An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.
  • Malicious Logic Insertion CAPEC-441 An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.
  • Modification of Windows Service Configuration CAPEC-478 An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.
  • Malicious Root Certificate CAPEC-479 An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.
  • Intent Spoof CAPEC-502 An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.
  • WebView Exposure CAPEC-503 An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.
  • Data Injected During Configuration CAPEC-536 An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.
  • Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment CAPEC-546 An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.
  • Install New Service CAPEC-550 When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.
  • Modify Existing Service CAPEC-551 When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.
  • Install Rootkit CAPEC-552 An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.
  • Replace File Extension Handlers CAPEC-556 When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.
  • Replace Trusted Executable CAPEC-558 An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.
  • Modify Shared File CAPEC-562 An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.
  • Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot CAPEC-563 An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.
  • Run Software at Logon CAPEC-564 Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.
  • Disable Security Software CAPEC-578 An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update10:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update10:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update3:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update4:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update4:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update5:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update5:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update6:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update6:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update7:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update7:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update9:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jdk:1.7.0:update9:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update10:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update10:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update3:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update4:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update4:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update5:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update5:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update6:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update6:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update7:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update7:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update9:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:jre:1.7.0:update9:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:12.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:12.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse:12.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse:12.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2013-0422: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-26205 – Lua 5.4.7, when the debug library is used, has a out-of-bounds read and segmentation violation in mainpositionTV in ltable.c. NOTE: this is dispute...
  • CVE-2025-26204 – Lua 5.4.7, when the debug library is used, has a out-of-bounds read and segmentation violation in equalkey in ltable.c. NOTE: this is disputed beca...
  • CVE-2025-2129 – A vulnerability was found in Mage AI 0.9.75. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to insecur...
  • CVE-2025-2127 – A vulnerability was found in JoomlaUX JUX Real Estate 3.4.0 on Joomla. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of th...
  • CVE-2025-2126 – A vulnerability was found in JoomlaUX JUX Real Estate 3.4.0 on Joomla and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the...