Focus on weitong vulnerabilities and metrics.
Last updated: 18 May 2025, 22:25 UTC
This page consolidates all known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) associated with weitong. We track both calendar-based metrics (using fixed periods) and rolling metrics (using gliding windows) to give you a comprehensive view of security trends and risk evolution. Use these insights to assess risk and plan your patching strategy.
For a broader perspective on cybersecurity threats, explore the comprehensive list of CVEs by vendor and product. Stay updated on critical vulnerabilities affecting major software and hardware providers.
Total weitong CVEs: 2
Earliest CVE date: 30 Apr 2025, 14:15 UTC
Latest CVE date: 30 Apr 2025, 14:15 UTC
Latest CVE reference: CVE-2025-4119
30-day Count (Rolling): 2
365-day Count (Rolling): 2
Calendar-based Variation
Calendar-based Variation compares a fixed calendar period (e.g., this month versus the same month last year), while Rolling Growth Rate uses a continuous window (e.g., last 30 days versus the previous 30 days) to capture trends independent of calendar boundaries.
Month Variation (Calendar): 0%
Year Variation (Calendar): 0%
Month Growth Rate (30-day Rolling): 0.0%
Year Growth Rate (365-day Rolling): 0.0%
Average CVSS: 5.0
Max CVSS: 5.0
Critical CVEs (≥9): 0
Range | Count |
---|---|
0.0-3.9 | 0 |
4.0-6.9 | 2 |
7.0-8.9 | 0 |
9.0-10.0 | 0 |
These are the five CVEs with the highest CVSS scores for weitong, sorted by severity first and recency.
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Weitong Mall 1.0.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /queryTotal of the component Product Statistics Handler. The manipulation of the argument isDelete with the input 1 leads to improper access controls. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Weitong Mall 1.0.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /historyList of the component Product History Handler. The manipulation of the argument isDelete with the input 1 leads to improper access controls. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.