node-formidable CVE Vulnerabilities & Metrics

Focus on node-formidable vulnerabilities and metrics.

Last updated: 16 Jan 2026, 23:25 UTC

About node-formidable Security Exposure

This page consolidates all known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) associated with node-formidable. We track both calendar-based metrics (using fixed periods) and rolling metrics (using gliding windows) to give you a comprehensive view of security trends and risk evolution. Use these insights to assess risk and plan your patching strategy.

For a broader perspective on cybersecurity threats, explore the comprehensive list of CVEs by vendor and product. Stay updated on critical vulnerabilities affecting major software and hardware providers.

Global CVE Overview

Total node-formidable CVEs: 1
Earliest CVE date: 26 Apr 2025, 21:15 UTC
Latest CVE date: 26 Apr 2025, 21:15 UTC

Latest CVE reference: CVE-2025-46653

Rolling Stats

30-day Count (Rolling): 0
365-day Count (Rolling): 1

Calendar-based Variation

Calendar-based Variation compares a fixed calendar period (e.g., this month versus the same month last year), while Rolling Growth Rate uses a continuous window (e.g., last 30 days versus the previous 30 days) to capture trends independent of calendar boundaries.

Variations & Growth

Month Variation (Calendar): 0%
Year Variation (Calendar): 0%

Month Growth Rate (30-day Rolling): 0.0%
Year Growth Rate (365-day Rolling): 0.0%

Monthly CVE Trends (current vs previous Year)

Annual CVE Trends (Last 20 Years)

Critical node-formidable CVEs (CVSS ≥ 9) Over 20 Years

CVSS Stats

Average CVSS: 0.0

Max CVSS: 0

Critical CVEs (≥9): 0

CVSS Range vs. Count

Range Count
0.0-3.9 1
4.0-6.9 0
7.0-8.9 0
9.0-10.0 0

CVSS Distribution Chart

Top 5 Highest CVSS node-formidable CVEs

These are the five CVEs with the highest CVSS scores for node-formidable, sorted by severity first and recency.

All CVEs for node-formidable

CVE-2025-46653 node-formidable vulnerability CVSS: 0 26 Apr 2025, 21:15 UTC

Formidable (aka node-formidable) 2.1.0 through 3.x before 3.5.3 relies on hexoid to prevent guessing of filenames for untrusted executable content; however, hexoid is documented as not "cryptographically secure." (Also, there is a scenario in which only the last two characters of a hexoid string need to be guessed, but this is not often relevant.) NOTE: this does not imply that, in a typical use case, attackers will be able to exploit any hexoid behavior to upload and execute their own content.