Focus on ncia vulnerabilities and metrics.
Last updated: 29 Jun 2025, 22:25 UTC
This page consolidates all known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) associated with ncia. We track both calendar-based metrics (using fixed periods) and rolling metrics (using gliding windows) to give you a comprehensive view of security trends and risk evolution. Use these insights to assess risk and plan your patching strategy.
For a broader perspective on cybersecurity threats, explore the comprehensive list of CVEs by vendor and product. Stay updated on critical vulnerabilities affecting major software and hardware providers.
Total ncia CVEs: 3
Earliest CVE date: 18 Jul 2023, 15:15 UTC
Latest CVE date: 17 Jul 2024, 18:15 UTC
Latest CVE reference: CVE-2024-38447
30-day Count (Rolling): 0
365-day Count (Rolling): 2
Calendar-based Variation
Calendar-based Variation compares a fixed calendar period (e.g., this month versus the same month last year), while Rolling Growth Rate uses a continuous window (e.g., last 30 days versus the previous 30 days) to capture trends independent of calendar boundaries.
Month Variation (Calendar): 0%
Year Variation (Calendar): 100.0%
Month Growth Rate (30-day Rolling): 0.0%
Year Growth Rate (365-day Rolling): 100.0%
Average CVSS: 0.0
Max CVSS: 0
Critical CVEs (≥9): 0
Range | Count |
---|---|
0.0-3.9 | 3 |
4.0-6.9 | 0 |
7.0-8.9 | 0 |
9.0-10.0 | 0 |
These are the five CVEs with the highest CVSS scores for ncia, sorted by severity first and recency.
NATO NCI ANET 3.4.1 allows Insecure Direct Object Reference via a modified ID field in a request for a private draft report (that belongs to an arbitrary user).
NATO NCI ANET 3.4.1 mishandles report ownership. A user can create a report and, despite the restrictions imposed by the UI, change the author of that report to an arbitrary user (without their consent or knowledge) via a modified UUID in a POST request.
In NATO Communications and Information Agency anet (aka Advisor Network) through 3.3.0, an attacker can provide a crafted JSON file to sanitizeJson and cause an exception. This is related to the U+FFFD Unicode replacement character. A for loop does not consider that a data structure is being modified during loop execution.