invisible-island CVE Vulnerabilities & Metrics

Focus on invisible-island vulnerabilities and metrics.

Last updated: 16 Apr 2026, 22:25 UTC

About invisible-island Security Exposure

This page consolidates all known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) associated with invisible-island. We track both calendar-based metrics (using fixed periods) and rolling metrics (using gliding windows) to give you a comprehensive view of security trends and risk evolution. Use these insights to assess risk and plan your patching strategy.

For a broader perspective on cybersecurity threats, explore the comprehensive list of CVEs by vendor and product. Stay updated on critical vulnerabilities affecting major software and hardware providers.

Global CVE Overview

Total invisible-island CVEs: 6
Earliest CVE date: 17 Oct 2005, 20:06 UTC
Latest CVE date: 19 Mar 2026, 15:16 UTC

Latest CVE reference: CVE-2025-69720

Rolling Stats

30-day Count (Rolling): 1
365-day Count (Rolling): 1

Calendar-based Variation

Calendar-based Variation compares a fixed calendar period (e.g., this month versus the same month last year), while Rolling Growth Rate uses a continuous window (e.g., last 30 days versus the previous 30 days) to capture trends independent of calendar boundaries.

Variations & Growth

Month Variation (Calendar): 0%
Year Variation (Calendar): 0%

Month Growth Rate (30-day Rolling): 0.0%
Year Growth Rate (365-day Rolling): 0.0%

Monthly CVE Trends (current vs previous Year)

Annual CVE Trends (Last 20 Years)

Critical invisible-island CVEs (CVSS ≥ 9) Over 20 Years

CVSS Stats

Average CVSS: 4.02

Max CVSS: 9.3

Critical CVEs (≥9): 2

CVSS Range vs. Count

Range Count
0.0-3.9 5
4.0-6.9 0
7.0-8.9 2
9.0-10.0 2

CVSS Distribution Chart

Top 5 Highest CVSS invisible-island CVEs

These are the five CVEs with the highest CVSS scores for invisible-island, sorted by severity first and recency.

All CVEs for invisible-island

The infocmp command-line tool in ncurses before 6.5-20251213 has a stack-based buffer overflow in analyze_string in progs/infocmp.c.

NCurse v6.4-20230418 was discovered to contain a segmentation fault via the component _nc_wrap_entry().

xterm before 380 supports ReGIS reporting for character-set names even if they have unexpected characters (i.e., neither alphanumeric nor underscore), aka a pointer/overflow issue. This can only occur for xterm installations that are configured at compile time to use a certain experimental feature.

xterm before 375 allows code execution via font ops, e.g., because an OSC 50 response may have Ctrl-g and therefore lead to command execution within the vi line-editing mode of Zsh. NOTE: font ops are not allowed in the xterm default configurations of some Linux distributions.

CVE-2022-24130 invisible-island vulnerability CVSS: 2.6 31 Jan 2022, 05:15 UTC

xterm through Patch 370, when Sixel support is enabled, allows attackers to trigger a buffer overflow in set_sixel in graphics_sixel.c via crafted text.

CVE-2021-27135 invisible-island vulnerability CVSS: 7.5 10 Feb 2021, 16:15 UTC

xterm before Patch #366 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a crafted UTF-8 combining character sequence.

CVE-2008-2383 invisible-island vulnerability CVSS: 9.3 02 Jan 2009, 18:11 UTC

CRLF injection vulnerability in xterm allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary commands via LF (aka \n) characters surrounding a command name within a Device Control Request Status String (DECRQSS) escape sequence in a text file, a related issue to CVE-2003-0063 and CVE-2003-0071.

CVE-2006-7236 invisible-island vulnerability CVSS: 9.3 02 Jan 2009, 18:11 UTC

The default configuration of xterm on Debian GNU/Linux sid and possibly Ubuntu enables the allowWindowOps resource, which allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code or have unspecified other impact via escape sequences.

CVE-2005-3120 invisible-island vulnerability CVSS: 7.5 17 Oct 2005, 20:06 UTC

Stack-based buffer overflow in the HTrjis function in Lynx 2.8.6 and earlier allows remote NNTP servers to execute arbitrary code via certain article headers containing Asian characters that cause Lynx to add extra escape (ESC) characters.