Focus on hliu vulnerabilities and metrics.
Last updated: 01 Aug 2025, 22:25 UTC
This page consolidates all known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) associated with hliu. We track both calendar-based metrics (using fixed periods) and rolling metrics (using gliding windows) to give you a comprehensive view of security trends and risk evolution. Use these insights to assess risk and plan your patching strategy.
For a broader perspective on cybersecurity threats, explore the comprehensive list of CVEs by vendor and product. Stay updated on critical vulnerabilities affecting major software and hardware providers.
Total hliu CVEs: 6
Earliest CVE date: 20 Mar 2025, 10:15 UTC
Latest CVE date: 20 Mar 2025, 10:15 UTC
Latest CVE reference: CVE-2024-9311
30-day Count (Rolling): 0
365-day Count (Rolling): 6
Calendar-based Variation
Calendar-based Variation compares a fixed calendar period (e.g., this month versus the same month last year), while Rolling Growth Rate uses a continuous window (e.g., last 30 days versus the previous 30 days) to capture trends independent of calendar boundaries.
Month Variation (Calendar): 0%
Year Variation (Calendar): 0%
Month Growth Rate (30-day Rolling): 0.0%
Year Growth Rate (365-day Rolling): 0.0%
Average CVSS: 0.0
Max CVSS: 0
Critical CVEs (≥9): 0
| Range | Count |
|---|---|
| 0.0-3.9 | 6 |
| 4.0-6.9 | 0 |
| 7.0-8.9 | 0 |
| 9.0-10.0 | 0 |
These are the five CVEs with the highest CVSS scores for hliu, sorted by severity first and recency.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in haotian-liu/llava v1.2.0 (LLaVA-1.6) allows an attacker to upload files with malicious content without authentication or user interaction. The uploaded file is stored in a predictable path, enabling the attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the victim's browser by visiting the crafted file URL. This can lead to theft of sensitive information, session hijacking, or other actions compromising the security and privacy of the victim.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the POST /worker_generate_stream API endpoint of the Controller API Server in haotian-liu/llava version v1.2.0 (LLaVA-1.6). This vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the victim Controller API Server's credentials to perform unauthorized web actions or access unauthorized web resources.
An open redirect vulnerability in haotian-liu/llava version v1.2.0 (LLaVA-1.6) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to redirect users to arbitrary websites via a specially crafted URL. This can be exploited for phishing attacks, malware distribution, and credential theft.
A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the file upload feature of haotian-liu/llava, specifically in Release v1.2.0 (LLaVA-1.6). The vulnerability is due to improper handling of form-data with a large filename in the file upload request. By sending a payload with an excessively large filename, the server becomes overwhelmed and unresponsive, leading to unavailability for legitimate users. This issue can be exploited without authentication, making it highly scalable and increasing the risk of exploitation.
A vulnerability in haotian-liu/llava version 1.2.0 (LLaVA-1.6) allows for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through the /run/predict endpoint. An attacker can gain unauthorized access to internal networks or the AWS metadata endpoint by sending crafted requests that exploit insufficient validation of the path parameter. This flaw can lead to unauthorized network access, sensitive data exposure, and further exploitation within the network.
A vulnerability in haotian-liu/llava v1.2.0 allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by appending a large number of characters to the end of a multipart boundary in a file upload request. This causes the server to continuously process each character, rendering the application inaccessible.