Focus on geutebrueck vulnerabilities and metrics.
Last updated: 08 Mar 2025, 23:25 UTC
This page consolidates all known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) associated with geutebrueck. We track both calendar-based metrics (using fixed periods) and rolling metrics (using gliding windows) to give you a comprehensive view of security trends and risk evolution. Use these insights to assess risk and plan your patching strategy.
For a broader perspective on cybersecurity threats, explore the comprehensive list of CVEs by vendor and product. Stay updated on critical vulnerabilities affecting major software and hardware providers.
Total geutebrueck CVEs: 24
Earliest CVE date: 19 May 2017, 03:29 UTC
Latest CVE date: 13 Sep 2021, 18:15 UTC
Latest CVE reference: CVE-2021-33554
30-day Count (Rolling): 0
365-day Count (Rolling): 0
Calendar-based Variation
Calendar-based Variation compares a fixed calendar period (e.g., this month versus the same month last year), while Rolling Growth Rate uses a continuous window (e.g., last 30 days versus the previous 30 days) to capture trends independent of calendar boundaries.
Month Variation (Calendar): 0%
Year Variation (Calendar): 0%
Month Growth Rate (30-day Rolling): 0.0%
Year Growth Rate (365-day Rolling): 0.0%
Average CVSS: 6.85
Max CVSS: 10.0
Critical CVEs (≥9): 4
| Range | Count |
|---|---|
| 0.0-3.9 | 1 |
| 4.0-6.9 | 15 |
| 7.0-8.9 | 4 |
| 9.0-10.0 | 4 |
These are the five CVEs with the highest CVSS scores for geutebrueck, sorted by severity first and recency.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow condition in the action parameter, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow condition in the profile parameter which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow condition in the name parameter, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow condition in the counter parameter which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors are vulnerable to command injection, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
Multiple camera devices by UDP Technology, Geutebrück and other vendors allow unauthenticated remote access to sensitive files due to default user authentication settings. This can lead to manipulation of the device and denial of service.
Using a specially crafted URL command, a remote authenticated user can execute commands as root on the G-Cam and G-Code (Firmware Versions 1.12.0.25 and prior as well as the limited Versions 1.12.13.2 and 1.12.14.5).
Geutebruck IP Cameras G-Code(EEC-2xxx), G-Cam(EBC-21xx/EFD-22xx/ETHC-22xx/EWPC-22xx): All versions 1.12.0.25 and prior may allow a remote authenticated attacker with access to network configuration to supply system commands to the server, leading to remote code execution as root.
Geutebruck IP Cameras G-Code(EEC-2xxx), G-Cam(EBC-21xx/EFD-22xx/ETHC-22xx/EWPC-22xx): All versions 1.12.0.25 and prior may allow a remote authenticated attacker with access to event configuration to store malicious code on the server, which could later be triggered by a legitimate user resulting in code execution within the user’s browser.
Geutebruck IP Cameras G-Code(EEC-2xxx), G-Cam(EBC-21xx/EFD-22xx/ETHC-22xx/EWPC-22xx): All versions 1.12.0.25 and prior may allow a remote authenticated user, using a specially crafted URL command, to execute commands as root.
Unauthentication vulnerabilities have been identified in Geutebruck G-Cam/EFD-2250 Version 1.12.0.4 and Topline TopFD-2125 Version 3.15.1 IP cameras, which may allow remote code execution.
An SQL injection vulnerability has been identified in Geutebruck G-Cam/EFD-2250 Version 1.12.0.4 and Topline TopFD-2125 Version 3.15.1 IP cameras, which may allow an attacker to alter stored data.
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability has been identified in Geutebruck G-Cam/EFD-2250 Version 1.12.0.4 and Topline TopFD-2125 Version 3.15.1 IP cameras, which may allow an unauthorized user to be added to the system.
An improper access control vulnerability has been identified in Geutebruck G-Cam/EFD-2250 Version 1.12.0.4 and Topline TopFD-2125 Version 3.15.1 IP cameras, which could allow a full configuration download, including passwords.
A server-side request forgery vulnerability has been identified in Geutebruck G-Cam/EFD-2250 Version 1.12.0.4 and Topline TopFD-2125 Version 3.15.1 IP cameras, which could lead to proxied network scans.
A cross-site scripting vulnerability has been identified in Geutebruck G-Cam/EFD-2250 Version 1.12.0.4 and Topline TopFD-2125 Version 3.15.1 IP cameras, which may allow remote code execution.
Stack-based buffer overflow in GCoreServer.exe in the server in Geutebrueck Gcore 1.3.8.42 and 1.4.2.37 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long URI in a GET request.
An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements (in an OS command) issue was discovered in Geutebruck IP Camera G-Cam/EFD-2250 Version 1.11.0.12. An improper neutralization of special elements vulnerability has been identified. If special elements are not properly neutralized, an attacker can call multiple parameters that can allow access to the root level operating system which could allow remote code execution.