Focus on friendica vulnerabilities and metrics.
Last updated: 08 Mar 2025, 23:25 UTC
This page consolidates all known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) associated with friendica. We track both calendar-based metrics (using fixed periods) and rolling metrics (using gliding windows) to give you a comprehensive view of security trends and risk evolution. Use these insights to assess risk and plan your patching strategy.
For a broader perspective on cybersecurity threats, explore the comprehensive list of CVEs by vendor and product. Stay updated on critical vulnerabilities affecting major software and hardware providers.
Total friendica CVEs: 3
Earliest CVE date: 05 Apr 2021, 23:15 UTC
Latest CVE date: 20 Aug 2024, 14:15 UTC
Latest CVE reference: CVE-2024-39094
30-day Count (Rolling): 0
365-day Count (Rolling): 2
Calendar-based Variation
Calendar-based Variation compares a fixed calendar period (e.g., this month versus the same month last year), while Rolling Growth Rate uses a continuous window (e.g., last 30 days versus the previous 30 days) to capture trends independent of calendar boundaries.
Month Variation (Calendar): 0%
Year Variation (Calendar): 0%
Month Growth Rate (30-day Rolling): 0.0%
Year Growth Rate (365-day Rolling): 0.0%
Average CVSS: 1.67
Max CVSS: 5.0
Critical CVEs (≥9): 0
Range | Count |
---|---|
0.0-3.9 | 2 |
4.0-6.9 | 1 |
7.0-8.9 | 0 |
9.0-10.0 | 0 |
These are the five CVEs with the highest CVSS scores for friendica, sorted by severity first and recency.
Friendica 2024.03 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in settings/profile via the homepage, xmpp, and matrix parameters.
Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Friendica v.2023.12 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the location parameter of the calendar event feature.
Module/Settings/UserExport.php in Friendica through 2021.01 allows settings/userexport to be used by anonymous users, as demonstrated by an attempted access to an array offset on a value of type null, and excessive memory consumption. NOTE: the vendor states "the feature still requires a valid authentication cookie even if the route is accessible to non-logged users.