efforthye CVE Vulnerabilities & Metrics

Focus on efforthye vulnerabilities and metrics.

Last updated: 15 Feb 2026, 23:25 UTC

About efforthye Security Exposure

This page consolidates all known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) associated with efforthye. We track both calendar-based metrics (using fixed periods) and rolling metrics (using gliding windows) to give you a comprehensive view of security trends and risk evolution. Use these insights to assess risk and plan your patching strategy.

For a broader perspective on cybersecurity threats, explore the comprehensive list of CVEs by vendor and product. Stay updated on critical vulnerabilities affecting major software and hardware providers.

Global CVE Overview

Total efforthye CVEs: 1
Earliest CVE date: 07 Jan 2026, 17:16 UTC
Latest CVE date: 07 Jan 2026, 17:16 UTC

Latest CVE reference: CVE-2025-67364

Rolling Stats

30-day Count (Rolling): 0
365-day Count (Rolling): 1

Calendar-based Variation

Calendar-based Variation compares a fixed calendar period (e.g., this month versus the same month last year), while Rolling Growth Rate uses a continuous window (e.g., last 30 days versus the previous 30 days) to capture trends independent of calendar boundaries.

Variations & Growth

Month Variation (Calendar): -100.0%
Year Variation (Calendar): 0%

Month Growth Rate (30-day Rolling): -100.0%
Year Growth Rate (365-day Rolling): 0.0%

Monthly CVE Trends (current vs previous Year)

Annual CVE Trends (Last 20 Years)

Critical efforthye CVEs (CVSS ≥ 9) Over 20 Years

CVSS Stats

Average CVSS: 0.0

Max CVSS: 0

Critical CVEs (≥9): 0

CVSS Range vs. Count

Range Count
0.0-3.9 1
4.0-6.9 0
7.0-8.9 0
9.0-10.0 0

CVSS Distribution Chart

Top 5 Highest CVSS efforthye CVEs

These are the five CVEs with the highest CVSS scores for efforthye, sorted by severity first and recency.

All CVEs for efforthye

CVE-2025-67364 efforthye vulnerability CVSS: 0 07 Jan 2026, 17:16 UTC

fast-filesystem-mcp version 3.4.0 contains a critical path traversal vulnerability in its file operation tools including fast_read_file. This vulnerability arises from improper path validation that fails to resolve symbolic links to their actual physical paths. The safePath and isPathAllowed functions use path.resolve() which does not handle symlinks, allowing attackers to bypass directory access restrictions by creating symlinks within allowed directories that point to restricted system paths. When these symlinks are accessed through valid path references, the validation checks are circumvented, enabling access to unauthorized files.