Focus on drivelock vulnerabilities and metrics.
Last updated: 13 Oct 2026, 22:25 UTC
This page consolidates all known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) associated with drivelock. We track both calendar-based metrics (using fixed periods) and rolling metrics (using gliding windows) to give you a comprehensive view of security trends and risk evolution. Use these insights to assess risk and plan your patching strategy.
For a broader perspective on cybersecurity threats, explore the comprehensive list of CVEs by vendor and product. Stay updated on critical vulnerabilities affecting major software and hardware providers.
Total drivelock CVEs: 9
Earliest CVE date: 26 Sep 2025, 15:16 UTC
Latest CVE date: 17 Dec 2025, 22:16 UTC
Latest CVE reference: CVE-2025-67794
30-day Count (Rolling): 0
365-day Count (Rolling): 8
Calendar-based Variation
Calendar-based Variation compares a fixed calendar period (e.g., this month versus the same month last year), while Rolling Growth Rate uses a continuous window (e.g., last 30 days versus the previous 30 days) to capture trends independent of calendar boundaries.
Month Variation (Calendar): 0%
Year Variation (Calendar): 700.0%
Month Growth Rate (30-day Rolling): 0.0%
Year Growth Rate (365-day Rolling): 700.0%
Average CVSS: 0.0
Max CVSS: 0
Critical CVEs (≥9): 0
| Range | Count |
|---|---|
| 0.0-3.9 | 9 |
| 4.0-6.9 | 0 |
| 7.0-8.9 | 0 |
| 9.0-10.0 | 0 |
These are the five CVEs with the highest CVSS scores for drivelock, sorted by severity first and recency.
An issue was discovered in DriveLock 24.1 through 24.1.*, 24.2 before 24.2.8, and 25.1 before 25.1.6. Directories and files created by the agent are created with overly permissive ACLs, allowing local users without administrator rights to trigger actions or destabilize the agent.
An issue was discovered in DriveLock 24.1 through 24.1.*, 24.2 through 24.2.*, and 25.1 through 25.1.*. An incomplete configuration (agent authentication) in DriveLock tenant allows attackers to impersonate any DriveLock agent on the network against the DES (DriveLock Enterprise Service).
An issue was discovered in DriveLock 24.1 through 24.1.*, 24.2 through 24.2.*, and 25.1 before 25.1.6. Users with the "Manage roles and permissions" privilege can promote themselves or other DOC users to the Supervisor role through an API call. This privilege is included by default in the Administrator role. This issue mainly affects cloud multi-tenant deployments; on-prem single-tenant installations are typically not impacted because local admins usually already have Supervisor privileges.
An issue was discovered in DriveLock 24.1 before 24.1.6, 24.2 before 24.2.7, and 25.1 before 25.1.5. Local unprivileged users can manipulate a DriveLock process to execute arbitrary commands on Windows computers.
An issue was discovered in DriveLock 24.1 before 24.1.6, 24.2 before 24.2.7, and 25.1 before 25.1.5. An unprivileged user could cause occasionally a Blue Screen Of Death (BSOD) on Windows computers by using an IOCTL and an unterminated string.
An issue was discovered in DriveLock 24.1 before 24.1.6, 24.2 before 24.2.7, and 25.1 before 25.1.5. Authenticated users can retrieve the computer count of other DriveLock tenants via the DriveLock API.
An issue was discovered in 25.1.2 before 25.1.5. A Cross Site Scripting (XSS) issue in DriveLock Operations Center allows for session takeover over a network.
An issue was discovered in DriveLock 24.1 before 24.1.6, 24.2 before 24.2.7, and 25.1 before 25.1.5. Local unprivileged users can manipulate privileged processes to gain more privileges on Windows computers.
In DriveLock 24.1.4 before 24.1.5, 24.2.5 before 24.2.6, and 25.1.2 before 25.1.4, attackers can gain elevated privileges.