acquia CVE Vulnerabilities & Metrics

When logging in with the correct username and incorrect weak password, the user receives the notification, that their password is too weak. However when an incorrect username is provided alongside with a weak password, the application responds with ’Invalid credentials’ notification. This difference could be used to perform username enumeration.

Mautic allows you to update the application via an upgrade script. The upgrade logic isn't shielded off correctly, which may lead to vulnerable situation. This vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that Mautic needs to be installed in a certain way to be vulnerable.

Prior to this patch, a stored XSS vulnerability existed in the contact tracking and page hits report.

With access to edit a Mautic form, the attacker can add Cross-Site Scripting stored in the html filed. This could be used to steal sensitive information from the user's current session.

Prior to this patch being applied, Mautic's tracking was vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting through the Page URL variable.

The logic in place to facilitate the update process via the user interface lacks access control to verify if permission exists to perform the tasks. Prior to this patch being applied it might be possible for an attacker to access the Mautic version number or to execute parts of the upgrade process without permission. As upgrading in the user interface is deprecated, this functionality is no longer required.

Prior to the patched version, an authenticated user of Mautic could read system files and access the internal addresses of the application due to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.

Prior to the patched version, logged in users of Mautic are able to access areas of the application that they should be prevented from accessing. Users could potentially access sensitive data such as names and surnames, company names and stage names.

Prior to the patched version, logged in users of Mautic are vulnerable to an SQL injection vulnerability in the Reports bundle. The user could retrieve and alter data like sensitive data, login, and depending on database permission the attacker can manipulate file systems.

Prior to the patched version, logged in users of Mautic are vulnerable to a self XSS vulnerability in the notifications within Mautic. Users could inject malicious code into the notification when saving Dashboards.

Prior to the patched version, logged in users of Mautic are vulnerable to Relative Path Traversal/Arbitrary File Deletion. Regardless of the level of access the Mautic user had, they could delete files other than those in the media folders such as system files, libraries or other important files. This vulnerability exists in the implementation of the GrapesJS builder in Mautic.

Prior to the patched version, there is an XSS vulnerability in the description fields within the Mautic application which could be exploited by a logged in user of Mautic with the appropriate permissions. This could lead to the user having elevated access to the system.

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web tracking component of Mautic before 4.3.0 allows remote attackers to inject executable javascript

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the installer component of Mautic before 4.3.0 allows admins to inject executable javascript

The function mt_rand is used to generate session tokens, this function is cryptographically flawed due to its nature being one pseudorandomness, an attacker can take advantage of the cryptographically insecure nature of this function to enumerate session tokens for accounts that are not under his/her control This issue affects: Mautic Mautic versions prior to 3.3.4; versions prior to 4.0.0.

Mautic versions before 3.3.4/4.0.0 are vulnerable to an inline JS XSS attack when viewing Mautic assets by utilizing inline JS in the title and adding a broken image URL as a remote asset. This can only be leveraged by an authenticated user with permission to create or edit assets.

Mautic versions before 3.3.4/4.0.0 are vulnerable to an inline JS XSS attack through the contact's first or last name and triggered when viewing a contact's details page then clicking on the action drop down and hovering over the Campaigns button. Contact first and last name can be populated from different sources such as UI, API, 3rd party syncing, forms, etc.

Insufficient sanitization / filtering allows for arbitrary JavaScript Injection in Mautic using the bounce management callback function. The values submitted in the "error" and "error_related_to" parameters of the POST request of the bounce management callback will be permanently stored and executed once the details page of an affected lead is opened by a Mautic user. An attacker with access to the bounce management callback function (identified with the Mailjet webhook, but it is assumed this will work uniformly across all kinds of webhooks) can inject arbitrary JavaScript Code into the "error" and "error_related_to" parameters of the POST request (POST /mailer/<product / webhook>/callback). It is noted that there is no authentication needed to access this function. The JavaScript Code is stored permanently in the web application and executed every time an authenticated user views the details page of a single contact / lead in Mautic. This means, arbitrary code can be executed to, e.g., steal or tamper with information.

For Mautic versions prior to 3.3.4/4.0.0, there is an XSS vulnerability on Mautic's password reset page where a vulnerable parameter, "bundle," in the URL could allow an attacker to execute Javascript code. The attacker would be required to convince or trick the target into clicking a password reset URL with the vulnerable parameter utilized.

In all versions prior to Mautic 3.3.2, secret parameters such as database credentials could be exposed publicly by an authorized admin user through leveraging Symfony parameter syntax in any of the free text fields in Mautic’s configuration that are used in publicly facing parts of the application.

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the forms component of Mautic before 3.2.4 allows remote attackers to inject executable JavaScript via mautic[return] (a different attack method than CVE-2020-35124, but also related to the Referer concept).

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the assets component of Mautic before 3.2.4 allows remote attackers to inject executable JavaScript through the Referer header of asset downloads.

Mautic before 3.2.4 is affected by stored XSS. An attacker with permission to manage companies, an application feature, could attack other users, including administrators. For example, by loading an externally crafted JavaScript file, an attacker could eventually perform actions as the target user. These actions include changing the user passwords, altering user or email addresses, or adding a new administrator to the system.

An issue was discovered in Mautic 2.13.1. It has Stored XSS via the company name field.

An issue was discovered in Mautic 2.13.1. There is Stored XSS via the authorUrl field in config.json.

Mautic versions 1.0.0 - 2.11.0 are vulnerable to allowing any authorized Mautic user session (must be logged into Mautic) to use the Filemanager to download any file from the server that the web user has access to.

Mautic versions 2.0.0 - 2.11.0 with a SSO plugin installed could allow a disabled user to still login using email address

Mautic version 2.1.0 - 2.11.0 is vulnerable to an inline JS XSS attack when using Mautic forms on a Mautic landing page using GET parameters to pre-populate the form.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Mautic 1.4.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) delete email campaigns or (2) delete contacts.

The Mollom module 6.x-2.7 before 6.x-2.15 for Drupal allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and modify the mollom blacklist via unspecified vectors.

The Commons Wikis module before 7.x-3.1 for Drupal, as used in the Commons module before 7.x-3.1, does not properly restrict access to groups, which allows remote attackers to post arbitrary content to groups via unspecified vectors.

The Commons Group module before 7.x-3.1 for Drupal, as used in the Commons module before 7.x-3.1, does not properly restrict access to groups, which allows remote attackers to post arbitrary content to groups via unspecified vectors.

The commons_discussion_views_default_views function in modules/features/commons_discussion/commons_discussion.views_default.inc in the Drupal Commons module 6.x-2.x before 6.x-2.8 for Drupal does not properly enforce intended node access restrictions, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via the recent comments listing.