CVE-2026-92813 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2026-92813
Vulnerability Scoring

4.9
/10
Medium Risk

The vulnerability CVE-2026-92813 could compromise system integrity but typically requires user interaction to be exploited.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: High
    High-level privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2026-92813 Details

Status: Received on 16 Sep 2026, 21:17 UTC

Published on: 16 Sep 2026, 21:17 UTC

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

disclosure@vulncheck.com

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

CVE-2026-92813 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2026-92813: Metabase through 0.63.18 fails to properly validate the unspecified address 0.0.0.0 in custom GeoJSON URLs, allowing unauthenticated attackers to reach loopback services. Attackers can save a malicious GeoJSON entry with 0.0.0.0 and trigger requests that return loopback service responses to unauthenticated callers.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2026-92813

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2026-92813 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2026-92813

The exploitability of CVE-2026-92813 is influenced by multiple factors. Security teams should analyze system configurations and apply appropriate countermeasures to mitigate threats.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2026-92813, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2026-92813, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2026-92813 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2026-92813 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2026-92813 does not impact system availability.

CVE-2026-92813 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Server Side Request Forgery CAPEC-664 An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2026-92813: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-92816 – ComfyUI before 0.30.0 fails to sanitize folder_name input in dataset save nodes, allowing attackers to write files to arbitrary paths outside the o...
  • CVE-2026-92815 – changedetection.io through 0.60.6 fails to validate the Goto URL action in browser steps, allowing unauthenticated attackers to access internal add...
  • CVE-2026-92814 – changedetection.io through 0.60.6 fails to escape the scraped page title in HTML notifications, allowing arbitrary markup injection. Attackers can ...
  • CVE-2026-92813 – Metabase through 0.63.18 fails to properly validate the unspecified address 0.0.0.0 in custom GeoJSON URLs, allowing unauthenticated attackers to r...
  • CVE-2026-92812 – decap-server contains a path traversal vulnerability in the local proxy containment guard that uses plain string prefix comparison without path sep...