CVE-2026-76898 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2026-76898
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress
Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity:
    Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
  • Attack Vector:
    Attack Vector Under Analysis
  • Privileges Required: None
    No authentication is required for exploitation.
  • Scope:
    Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2026-76898 Details

Status: Received on 21 Sep 2026, 17:18 UTC

Published on: 21 Sep 2026, 17:18 UTC

CVSS Release:

CVE-2026-76898 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2026-76898: draw.io is a configurable diagramming and whiteboarding application. Prior to version 30.3.8, src/main/java/com/mxgraph/online/Utils.java checks IPv6 Unique Local Addresses in Utils.sanitizeUrl() by comparing the text prefixes fc00:: and fd00::, but the JDK returns the expanded address form, so the fc00::/7 range, including the AWS metadata range fd00:ec2::/32, is not blocked. An unauthenticated request to /embed2.js?fetch= can therefore make src/main/java/com/mxgraph/online/EmbedServlet2.java fetch an IPv6 ULA internal resource and reflect the response to the requester. Utils.validatedAddress() uses the same private-address check for the separate ProxyServlet path, which requires ENABLE_DRAWIO_PROXY=1. The primary /embed2.js path requires no proxy feature flag or DNS rebinding, and it can disclose cloud metadata credentials or data from other IPv6-reachable internal services. This issue is fixed in version 30.3.8.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2026-76898

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2026-76898 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2026-76898

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2026-76898.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2026-76898, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2026-76898, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2026-76898 does not compromise confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2026-76898 does not impact data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2026-76898 does not affect system availability.

CVE-2026-76898 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Server Side Request Forgery CAPEC-664 An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2026-76898: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-94488 – Telegram Desktop before 6.9.4 allows XSS in the HTML exporter. (The first fixed stable version is 7.0.1.) This occurs in button.text.toUtf8 in expo...
  • CVE-2026-93012 – Email::Sender::Transport::Sendmail versions before 2.602 for Perl allow arbitrary command execution on Windows sending a message whose envelope add...
  • CVE-2026-92382 – An out-of-bounds write flaw was found in usbredir. Starting an isochronous OUT stream with a transfer count of 1 leaves the stream's single transfe...
  • CVE-2026-69190 – Graylog is a free and open log management platform. From 6.3.0 until 6.3.14, 7.0.9, and 7.1.4, the view update API for saved searches and dashboard...
  • CVE-2026-62369 – KubeEdge is an open source system for extending native containerized application orchestration capabilities to hosts at Edge. From 1.16.0 until 1.2...