CVE-2026-7598 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2026-7598
Vulnerability Scoring

7.3
/10
Very High Risk

Highly exploitable, CVE-2026-7598 poses a critical security risk that could lead to severe breaches.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2026-7598 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕜 07 May 2026, 01:47 UTC
Originally published on: 🕙 01 May 2026, 22:16 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 5 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

cna@vuldb.com

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

CVE-2026-7598 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2026-7598: A security vulnerability has been detected in libssh2 up to 1.11.1. The impacted element is the function userauth_password of the file src/userauth.c. Such manipulation of the argument username_len/password_len leads to integer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The name of the patch is 256d04b60d80bf1190e96b0ad1e91b2174d744b1. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2026-7598

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2026-7598 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2026-7598

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2026-7598 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2026-7598, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2026-7598, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: Low
    CVE-2026-7598 could lead to minor leaks of non-critical information without major privacy breaches.
  • Integrity: Low
    Exploiting CVE-2026-7598 may cause minor changes to data without severely impacting its accuracy.
  • Availability: Low
    CVE-2026-7598 may slightly degrade system performance without fully affecting service availability.

CVE-2026-7598 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-190

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Forced Integer Overflow CAPEC-92 This attack forces an integer variable to go out of range. The integer variable is often used as an offset such as size of memory allocation or similarly. The attacker would typically control the value of such variable and try to get it out of range. For instance the integer in question is incremented past the maximum possible value, it may wrap to become a very small, or negative number, therefore providing a very incorrect value which can lead to unexpected behavior. At worst the attacker can execute arbitrary code.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.17:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.17:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.18:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:0.18:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.8.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.8.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libssh2:libssh2:1.10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2026-7598: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-9730 – The Remove NoFollow Commenter URL plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This ...
  • CVE-2026-9723 – The Google Plus One Bottom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.0.2. This is du...
  • CVE-2026-9722 – The Laiser Tag plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing...
  • CVE-2026-9599 – The Tectite Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missin...
  • CVE-2026-9234 – The JTL-Connector for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authorization in versions up to, and including, 2.4.1. This is due ...