CVE-2026-44636 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2026-44636
Vulnerability Scoring

7.4
/10
Very High Risk

Highly exploitable, CVE-2026-44636 poses a critical security risk that could lead to severe breaches.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: High
    Exploits require significant effort and special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Local
    Vulnerability requires local system access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2026-44636 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕐 16 May 2026, 01:16 UTC
Originally published on: 🕗 14 May 2026, 20:17 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 1 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

security-advisories@github.com

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE-2026-44636 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2026-44636: libsixel is a SIXEL encoder/decoder implementation derived from kmiya's sixel. From to 1.8.7-r1, signed integer overflow in sixel_encode_highcolor's allocation size calculation can lead to a heap buffer overflow. The public sixel_encode entry point validates only that width and height are greater than zero, with no upper bound. width and height are multiplied as plain int when computing the allocation size for paletted_pixels and normalized_pixels. Any caller that asks libsixel to encode a pixel buffer with width times height greater than INT_MAX (about 2.15 billion) will hit a wrapped allocation size; under the right wrap, the malloc succeeds with a buffer much smaller than the encoder expects, and the encoder writes past the end of the heap allocation. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.7-r2.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2026-44636

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2026-44636 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2026-44636

CVE-2026-44636 presents a challenge to exploit due to its high attack complexity, but the absence of privilege requirements still makes it a viable target for skilled attackers. A thorough security review is advised.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2026-44636, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2026-44636, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2026-44636 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: High
    CVE-2026-44636 could allow unauthorized modifications to data, potentially affecting system reliability and trust.
  • Availability: High
    CVE-2026-44636 can disrupt system operations, potentially causing complete denial of service (DoS).

CVE-2026-44636 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-190

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Forced Integer Overflow CAPEC-92 This attack forces an integer variable to go out of range. The integer variable is often used as an offset such as size of memory allocation or similarly. The attacker would typically control the value of such variable and try to get it out of range. For instance the integer in question is incremented past the maximum possible value, it may wrap to become a very small, or negative number, therefore providing a very incorrect value which can lead to unexpected behavior. At worst the attacker can execute arbitrary code.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.4.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.5.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.5.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.7-r1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:saitoha:libsixel:1.8.7-r1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2026-44636: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-8293 – The Really Simple Security WordPress plugin before 9.5.10.1 does not enforce the second-factor challenge in two of its two-factor authentication R...
  • CVE-2026-8206 – The Kirki – Freeform Page Builder, Website Builder & Customizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation via account takeover in ...
  • CVE-2026-3198 – MLflow 3.9.0 with basic-auth (`--app-name basic-auth`) fails to enforce authorization checks for multiple Gateway API 'list' endpoints. Specificall...
  • CVE-2026-10583 – A security vulnerability has been detected in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw up to 3.11.3. Affected by this issue is the function Import of the file inter...
  • CVE-2026-10581 – A flaw has been found in DedeCMS 5.7.88. Affected by this vulnerability is the function base64_decode of the file /plus/download.php?open=1. This m...