CVE-2026-43276 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2026-43276
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress
Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity:
    Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
  • Attack Vector:
    Attack Vector Under Analysis
  • Privileges Required: None
    No authentication is required for exploitation.
  • Scope:
    Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2026-43276 Details

Status: Awaiting Analysis

Published on: 06 May 2026, 12:16 UTC

CVSS Release:

CVE-2026-43276 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2026-43276: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: mana: Fix double destroy_workqueue on service rescan PCI path While testing corner cases in the driver, a use-after-free crash was found on the service rescan PCI path. When mana_serv_reset() calls mana_gd_suspend(), mana_gd_cleanup() destroys gc->service_wq. If the subsequent mana_gd_resume() fails with -ETIMEDOUT or -EPROTO, the code falls through to mana_serv_rescan() which triggers pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(). This invokes the PCI .remove callback (mana_gd_remove), which calls mana_gd_cleanup() a second time, attempting to destroy the already- freed workqueue. Fix this by NULL-checking gc->service_wq in mana_gd_cleanup() and setting it to NULL after destruction. Call stack of issue for reference: [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] Call Trace: [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] <TASK> [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] mana_gd_cleanup+0x33/0x70 [mana] [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] mana_gd_remove+0x3a/0xc0 [mana] [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] pci_device_remove+0x41/0xb0 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] device_remove+0x46/0x70 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] device_release_driver_internal+0x1e3/0x250 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] device_release_driver+0x12/0x20 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] pci_stop_bus_device+0x6a/0x90 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x13/0x30 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] mana_do_service+0x180/0x290 [mana] [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] mana_serv_func+0x24/0x50 [mana] [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] process_one_work+0x190/0x3d0 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] worker_thread+0x16e/0x2e0 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] kthread+0xf7/0x130 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] ret_from_fork+0x269/0x350 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [Sat Feb 21 18:53:48 2026] </TASK>

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2026-43276

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2026-43276 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2026-43276

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2026-43276.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2026-43276, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2026-43276, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2026-43276 does not compromise confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2026-43276 does not impact data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2026-43276 does not affect system availability.

CVE-2026-43276 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2026-43276: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-36358 – Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Juzaweb CMS v.5.0.0 allows a remote attacker via execute arbitrary code via a crafted script to the Add Banne...
  • CVE-2026-8026 – A security flaw has been discovered in FlowiseAI Flowise up to 3.0.12. Affected is the function Login of the file packages/server/src/enterprise/se...
  • CVE-2026-5081 – Apache::Session::Generate::ModUniqueId versions from 1.54 through 1.94 for Perl session ids are insecure. Apache::Session::Generate::ModUniqueId (...
  • CVE-2026-40562 – Gazelle versions through 0.49 for Perl allows HTTP Request Smuggling via Improper Header Precedence. Gazelle incorrectly prioritizes "Content-Leng...
  • CVE-2026-6210 – A type confusion vulnerability in Qt SVG allows an attacker to cause an application crash via a crafted SVG image. When processing SVG marker re...