CVE-2026-42769 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2026-42769
Vulnerability Scoring

5.3
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2026-42769 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: High
    Exploits require significant effort and special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: Low
    Some privileges are necessary to exploit the vulnerability.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2026-42769 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕕 15 Jun 2026, 18:26 UTC
Originally published on: 🕔 09 Jun 2026, 17:17 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 6 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

CVE-2026-42769 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2026-42769: Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate provided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) message response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which could lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA) level to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level. Impact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA certificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate. One of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in RFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover, which is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'. As part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA certificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its signature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the new one. The 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with OSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld' certificate. A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding an incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the certificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual (only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts of the verification code). An attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message protection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed certificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP clients would accept as a new trust anchor. Significant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials) are the reason the issue was assigned Low severity. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2026-42769

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2026-42769 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2026-42769

This vulnerability, CVE-2026-42769, requires a high level of attack complexity and low privileges, making it difficult but not impossible to exploit. Organizations should ensure robust security configurations to mitigate risks.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2026-42769, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2026-42769, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2026-42769 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2026-42769 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2026-42769 does not impact system availability.

CVE-2026-42769 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-295

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate CAPEC-459 An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
  • Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation CAPEC-475 An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.5.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.6.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.6.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.6.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.6.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.6.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.6.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:4.0.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:4.0.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2026-42769: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-54236 – vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.23.1rc0, the fix for CVE-2026-22778, which introduced a saniti...
  • CVE-2026-54235 – vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.23.1rc0, ll temperature validation gates use comparison operat...
  • CVE-2026-54233 – vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.23.1rc0, vLLM's /v1/audio/transcriptions endpoint limits compr...
  • CVE-2026-54232 – vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.22.1, the vLLM Dockerfile is vulnerable to a dependency confus...
  • CVE-2026-53923 – vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). From 0.5.5 until 0.23.1rc0, integer truncation of tensor dimensions in vL...