CVE-2026-33672 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2026-33672
Vulnerability Scoring

5.3
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2026-33672 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2026-33672 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕜 01 Apr 2026, 13:44 UTC
Originally published on: 🕙 26 Mar 2026, 22:16 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 5 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

security-advisories@github.com

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

CVE-2026-33672 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2026-33672: Picomatch is a glob matcher written JavaScript. Versions prior to 4.0.4, 3.0.2, and 2.3.2 are vulnerable to a method injection vulnerability affecting the `POSIX_REGEX_SOURCE` object. Because the object inherits from `Object.prototype`, specially crafted POSIX bracket expressions (e.g., `[[:constructor:]]`) can reference inherited method names. These methods are implicitly converted to strings and injected into the generated regular expression. This leads to incorrect glob matching behavior (integrity impact), where patterns may match unintended filenames. The issue does not enable remote code execution, but it can cause security-relevant logic errors in applications that rely on glob matching for filtering, validation, or access control. All users of affected `picomatch` versions that process untrusted or user-controlled glob patterns are potentially impacted. This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line. If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to picomatch. Possible mitigations include sanitizing or rejecting untrusted glob patterns, especially those containing POSIX character classes like `[[:...:]]`; avoiding the use of POSIX bracket expressions if user input is involved; and manually patching the library by modifying `POSIX_REGEX_SOURCE` to use a null prototype.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2026-33672

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2026-33672 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2026-33672

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2026-33672 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2026-33672, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2026-33672, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2026-33672 has no significant impact on data confidentiality.
  • Integrity: Low
    Exploiting CVE-2026-33672 may cause minor changes to data without severely impacting its accuracy.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2026-33672 does not impact system availability.

CVE-2026-33672 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-1321

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs CAPEC-1 In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by an authorization framework. This framework maps Access Control Lists (ACLs) to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application, or can run queries for data that they otherwise not supposed to.
  • Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels CAPEC-180 An attacker exploits a weakness in the configuration of access controls and is able to bypass the intended protection that these measures guard against and thereby obtain unauthorized access to the system or network. Sensitive functionality should always be protected with access controls. However configuring all but the most trivial access control systems can be very complicated and there are many opportunities for mistakes. If an attacker can learn of incorrectly configured access security settings, they may be able to exploit this in an attack.
  • Manipulating User-Controlled Variables CAPEC-77 This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:-:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:-:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.0.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.0.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.0.2:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.0.2:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.1.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.1.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.1.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.1.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.1.2:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.1.2:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.2.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:1.2.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.2:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.2:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.3:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.3:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.4:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.4:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.5:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.5:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.6:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.6:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.7:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.0.7:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.1.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.1.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.1.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.1.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.2.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.2.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.2.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.2.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.2.2:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.2.2:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.2.3:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.2.3:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.3.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.3.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.3.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:2.3.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:3.0.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:3.0.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:3.0.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:3.0.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:4.0.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:4.0.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:4.0.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:4.0.1:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:4.0.2:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:4.0.2:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:4.0.3:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:4.0.3:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2026-33672: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-40688 – A out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.11 may allow...
  • CVE-2026-39399 – NuGet Gallery is a package repository that powers nuget.org. A security vulnerability exists in the NuGetGallery backend job’s handling of .nuspec ...
  • CVE-2026-39387 – BoidCMS is an open-source, PHP-based flat-file CMS for building simple websites and blogs, using JSON as its database. Versions prior to 2.1.3 are ...
  • CVE-2026-35589 – nanobot is a personal AI assistant. Versions prior to 0.1.5 contain a Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) vulnerability exists in the bridge's W...
  • CVE-2026-35034 – Jellyfin is an open source self hosted media server. Versions prior to 10.11.7 contain a denial of service vulnerability in the SyncPlay group crea...