CVE-2026-30242 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2026-30242
Vulnerability Scoring

8.5
/10
Severe Risk

Cybersecurity professionals consider CVE-2026-30242 an immediate threat requiring urgent mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: Low
    Some privileges are necessary to exploit the vulnerability.
  • Scope: Changed
    Successful exploitation can impact components beyond the vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2026-30242 Details

Status: Received on 06 Mar 2026, 22:16 UTC

Published on: 06 Mar 2026, 22:16 UTC

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

security-advisories@github.com

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

CVE-2026-30242 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2026-30242: Plane is an an open-source project management tool. Prior to version 1.2.3, the webhook URL validation in plane/app/serializers/webhook.py only checks ip.is_loopback, allowing attackers with workspace ADMIN role to create webhooks pointing to private/internal network addresses (10.x.x.x, 172.16.x.x, 192.168.x.x, 169.254.169.254, etc.). When webhook events fire, the server makes requests to these internal addresses and stores the response — enabling SSRF with full response read-back. This issue has been patched in version 1.2.3.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2026-30242

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2026-30242 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2026-30242

CVE-2026-30242 presents an accessible attack vector with minimal effort required. Restricting access controls and implementing security updates are critical to reducing exploitation risks.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2026-30242, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2026-30242, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2026-30242 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: Low
    Exploiting CVE-2026-30242 may cause minor changes to data without severely impacting its accuracy.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2026-30242 does not impact system availability.

CVE-2026-30242 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Server Side Request Forgery CAPEC-664 An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2026-30242: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-25073 – XikeStor SKS8310-8X Network Switch firmware versions 1.04.B07 and prior contain a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows authenticat...
  • CVE-2026-25072 – XikeStor SKS8310-8X Network Switch firmware versions 1.04.B07 and prior contain a predictable session identifier vulnerability in the /goform/SetLo...
  • CVE-2026-25071 – XikeStor SKS8310-8X Network Switch firmware versions 1.04.B07 and prior contain a missing authentication vulnerability in the /switch_config.src en...
  • CVE-2026-25070 – XikeStor SKS8310-8X Network Switch firmware versions 1.04.B07 and prior contain an OS command injection vulnerability in the /goform/PingTestSet en...
  • CVE-2026-2371 – The Greenshift – animation and page builder blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, an...