CVE-2026-1677 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2026-1677
Vulnerability Scoring

5.3
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2026-1677 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2026-1677 Details

Status: Received on 11 May 2026, 06:16 UTC

Published on: 11 May 2026, 06:16 UTC

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

vulnerabilities@zephyrproject.org

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

CVE-2026-1677 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2026-1677: Zephyr sockets created with `IPPROTO_TLS_1_3` can still negotiate a TLS 1.2 connection when both TLS versions are enabled in Kconfig, because the socket-level protocol selection is not propagated to mbedTLS (e.g. via `mbedtls_ssl_conf_min_tls_version`). The ClientHello advertises both versions and the peer can establish TLS 1.2, so applications that assumed `IPPROTO_TLS_1_3` enforces TLS 1.3 may silently use TLS 1.2 and remain exposed to TLS 1.2-specific weaknesses. As a workaround, the `TLS_CIPHERSUITE_LIST` socket option can be restricted to TLS 1.3-only cipher suites.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2026-1677

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2026-1677 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2026-1677

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2026-1677 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2026-1677, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2026-1677, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: Low
    CVE-2026-1677 could lead to minor leaks of non-critical information without major privacy breaches.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2026-1677 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2026-1677 does not impact system availability.

CVE-2026-1677 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-757

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Client-Server Protocol Manipulation CAPEC-220 An adversary takes advantage of weaknesses in the protocol by which a client and server are communicating to perform unexpected actions. Communication protocols are necessary to transfer messages between client and server applications. Moreover, different protocols may be used for different types of interactions.
  • Weakening of Cellular Encryption CAPEC-606 An attacker, with control of a Cellular Rogue Base Station or through cooperation with a Malicious Mobile Network Operator can force the mobile device (e.g., the retransmission device) to use no encryption (A5/0 mode) or to use easily breakable encryption (A5/1 or A5/2 mode).
  • Drop Encryption Level CAPEC-620 An attacker forces the encryption level to be lowered, thus enabling a successful attack against the encrypted data.

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2026-1677: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-8276 – A flaw has been found in bettercap up to 2.41.5. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file modules/mysql_server/mysql_server...
  • CVE-2026-8275 – A vulnerability was detected in bettercap up to 2.41.5. Affected by this vulnerability is the function ippReadChunkedBody of the file modules/zerog...
  • CVE-2026-6433 – The Custom css-js-php WordPress plugin through 2.0.7 does not properly sanitize user input before using it in a SQL query, and the result is passed...
  • CVE-2026-1677 – Zephyr sockets created with `IPPROTO_TLS_1_3` can still negotiate a TLS 1.2 connection when both TLS versions are enabled in Kconfig, because the s...
  • CVE-2026-8274 – A security vulnerability has been detected in npitre cramfs-tools up to 2.1. Affected is the function do_directory of the file cramfsck.c of the co...