CVE-2026-15381 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2026-15381
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress
Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity:
    Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
  • Attack Vector:
    Attack Vector Under Analysis
  • Privileges Required: None
    No authentication is required for exploitation.
  • Scope:
    Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2026-15381 Details

Status: Received on 31 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC

Published on: 31 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC

CVSS Release:

CVE-2026-15381 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2026-15381: The WP Go Maps WordPress plugin before 10.1.04 does not properly sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL query, allowing unauthenticated users to perform SQL injection attacks.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2026-15381

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2026-15381 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2026-15381

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2026-15381.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2026-15381, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2026-15381, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2026-15381 does not compromise confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2026-15381 does not impact data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2026-15381 does not affect system availability.

CVE-2026-15381 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2026-15381: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-65309 – ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores and transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a one-way pas...
  • CVE-2026-18218 – A flaw was found in the TokenManager component of the Keycloak identity management service. When an administrator attempts to revoke tokens for a s...
  • CVE-2026-18217 – A flaw was found in the SAML protocol implementation of Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. The issue occurs when Key...
  • CVE-2026-18215 – Keycloak provides a way to let users log in using Microsoft accounts while restricting access to a specific organization (tenant). A flaw was disco...
  • CVE-2026-18214 – Keycloak allows users to log in using Google accounts and can be configured to only allow users from specific Google Workspace domains. A flaw was ...