CVE-2026-10678 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2026-10678
Vulnerability Scoring

8.1
/10
Severe Risk

Cybersecurity professionals consider CVE-2026-10678 an immediate threat requiring urgent mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Adjacent_network
    Attack Vector Under Analysis
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2026-10678 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕞 30 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC
Originally published on: 🕙 21 Jul 2026, 22:17 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 8 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

vulnerabilities@zephyrproject.org

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

CVE-2026-10678 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2026-10678: The MCTP-over-I2C+GPIO target binding in Zephyr (subsys/pmci/mctp/mctp_i2c_gpio_target.c) processes pseudo-register writes from an I2C bus master byte-by-byte in mctp_i2c_gpio_target_write_received() without validating the order or the receive buffer. In the affected versions the MCTP_I2C_GPIO_RX_MSG_ADDR (data) handler dereferences and writes through b->rx_pkt without checking that the receive buffer was allocated: a controller that selects the data register and writes a byte without first sending the length register (which is what allocates the buffer) causes a write of an attacker-chosen byte through a NULL/unallocated mctp_pktbuf pointer (i.e. into a small attacker-advanceable offset above address 0), producing memory corruption or a hard fault. The same handler also performs a write-then-check bounds test, allowing a one-byte heap overflow at data[255] when more than 255 data bytes are sent. Because the I2C target callback is invoked with raw bytes supplied by whatever device is the bus master and the binding performs no authentication, a malicious or malfunctioning controller on the bus can trigger these without any prior protocol state, leading to memory corruption and/or denial of service on the target device. The vulnerable code was introduced when the I2C+GPIO target binding was added and shipped in Zephyr v4.3.0 and v4.4.0. The fix defers allocation to the first data byte with a NULL check, treats a missing length as a zero-sized packet rejected by libmctp, and moves the bounds check before the store.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2026-10678

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2026-10678 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2026-10678

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2026-10678 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2026-10678, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2026-10678, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2026-10678 has no significant impact on data confidentiality.
  • Integrity: High
    CVE-2026-10678 could allow unauthorized modifications to data, potentially affecting system reliability and trust.
  • Availability: High
    CVE-2026-10678 can disrupt system operations, potentially causing complete denial of service (DoS).

CVE-2026-10678 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-787

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.3.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.3.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.3.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.3.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.3.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.3.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.3.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.3.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.3.1:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.3.1:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.4.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.4.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.4.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.4.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.4.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.4.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.4.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.4.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.4.1:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:zephyrproject:zephyr:4.4.1:-:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2026-10678: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-95512 – A flaw was found in FreeType, specifically within its CID font loader. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking a user into o...
  • CVE-2026-91784 – cjbassi/gotop is vulnerable to local argument injection via process termination functionality. The process name is passed directly to pkill without...
  • CVE-2026-80464 – Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Sef - AI Chatbot Platform allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects...
  • CVE-2026-80443 – Improper certificate validation vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Sef - AI Chatbot Platform allows Adversary in the Middle (AiTM). This issue affects...
  • CVE-2026-80337 – Missing Authorization vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Sef - AI Chatbot Platform allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. Th...