CVE-2025-9821 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-9821
Vulnerability Scoring

2.7
/10
Low Risk

Security experts classify CVE-2025-9821 as a minor vulnerability with limited consequences.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: High
    High-level privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-9821 Details

Status: Received on 03 Sep 2025, 10:15 UTC

Published on: 03 Sep 2025, 10:15 UTC

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

security@mautic.org

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

CVE-2025-9821 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-9821: SummaryUsers with webhook permissions can conduct SSRF via webhooks. If they have permission to view the webhook logs, the (partial) request response is also disclosed DetailsWhen sending webhooks, the destination is not validated, causing SSRF. ImpactBypass of firewalls to interact with internal services. See https://owasp.org/Top10/A10_2021-Server-Side_Request_Forgery_%28SSRF%29/  for more potential impact. Resources https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Server_Side_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html  for more information on SSRF and its fix.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-9821

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-9821 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-9821

The exploitability of CVE-2025-9821 is influenced by multiple factors. Security teams should analyze system configurations and apply appropriate countermeasures to mitigate threats.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-9821, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-9821, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: Low
    CVE-2025-9821 could lead to minor leaks of non-critical information without major privacy breaches.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2025-9821 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-9821 does not impact system availability.

CVE-2025-9821 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Server Side Request Forgery CAPEC-664 An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-9821: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-41000 – Cross-Frame Scripting (XFS) vulnerability in BoomCMS v9.1.4 from UXB London. XFS is a web attack technique that exploits specific browser bugs to s...
  • CVE-2025-9821 – SummaryUsers with webhook permissions can conduct SSRF via webhooks. If they have permission to view the webhook logs, the (partial) request respon...
  • CVE-2024-43166 – Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in Apache DolphinScheduler. This issue affects Apache DolphinScheduler: before 3.2.2. Users are recom...
  • CVE-2025-9219 – The Post SMTP – WP SMTP Plugin with Email Logs and Mobile App for Failure Notifications – Gmail SMTP, Office 365, Brevo, Mailgun, Amazon SES and mo...
  • CVE-2025-2415 – Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in Akinsoft MyRezzta allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects MyRezz...