CVE-2025-68360 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-68360
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress
Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity:
    Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
  • Attack Vector:
    Attack Vector Under Analysis
  • Privileges Required: None
    No authentication is required for exploitation.
  • Scope:
    Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-68360 Details

Status: Received on 24 Dec 2025, 11:15 UTC

Published on: 24 Dec 2025, 11:15 UTC

CVSS Release:

CVE-2025-68360 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-68360: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mt76: wed: use proper wed reference in mt76 wed driver callabacks MT7996 driver can use both wed and wed_hif2 devices to offload traffic from/to the wireless NIC. In the current codebase we assume to always use the primary wed device in wed callbacks resulting in the following crash if the hw runs wed_hif2 (e.g. 6GHz link). [ 297.455876] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 000000000000080a [ 297.464928] Mem abort info: [ 297.467722] ESR = 0x0000000096000005 [ 297.471461] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 297.476766] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 297.479809] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 297.482940] FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault [ 297.487809] Data abort info: [ 297.490679] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 297.496156] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 297.501196] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 297.506500] user pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000107480000 [ 297.512927] [000000000000080a] pgd=08000001097fb003, p4d=08000001097fb003, pud=08000001097fb003, pmd=0000000000000000 [ 297.523532] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 297.715393] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 45 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Tainted: G O 6.12.50 #0 [ 297.723908] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE [ 297.727384] Hardware name: Banana Pi BPI-R4 (2x SFP+) (DT) [ 297.732857] Workqueue: nf_ft_offload_del nf_flow_rule_route_ipv6 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.740254] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 297.747205] pc : mt76_wed_offload_disable+0x64/0xa0 [mt76] [ 297.752688] lr : mtk_wed_flow_remove+0x58/0x80 [ 297.757126] sp : ffffffc080fe3ae0 [ 297.760430] x29: ffffffc080fe3ae0 x28: ffffffc080fe3be0 x27: 00000000deadbef7 [ 297.767557] x26: ffffff80c5ebca00 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffff80c85f4c00 [ 297.774683] x23: ffffff80c1875b78 x22: ffffffc080d42cd0 x21: ffffffc080660018 [ 297.781809] x20: ffffff80c6a076d0 x19: ffffff80c6a043c8 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 297.788935] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000001 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 297.796060] x14: 0000000000000019 x13: ffffff80c0ad8ec0 x12: 00000000fa83b2da [ 297.803185] x11: ffffff80c02700c0 x10: ffffff80c0ad8ec0 x9 : ffffff81fef96200 [ 297.810311] x8 : ffffff80c02700c0 x7 : ffffff80c02700d0 x6 : 0000000000000002 [ 297.817435] x5 : 0000000000000400 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 297.824561] x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000000000800 x0 : ffffff80c6a063c8 [ 297.831686] Call trace: [ 297.834123] mt76_wed_offload_disable+0x64/0xa0 [mt76] [ 297.839254] mtk_wed_flow_remove+0x58/0x80 [ 297.843342] mtk_flow_offload_cmd+0x434/0x574 [ 297.847689] mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb+0x30/0x40 [ 297.852295] nf_flow_offload_ipv6_hook+0x7f4/0x964 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.858466] nf_flow_rule_route_ipv6+0x438/0x4a4 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.864463] process_one_work+0x174/0x300 [ 297.868465] worker_thread+0x278/0x430 [ 297.872204] kthread+0xd8/0xdc [ 297.875251] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 297.878820] Code: 928b5ae0 8b000273 91400a60 f943fa61 (79401421) [ 297.884901] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fix the issue detecting the proper wed reference to use running wed callabacks.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-68360

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-68360 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-68360

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2025-68360.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-68360, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-68360, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2025-68360 does not compromise confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2025-68360 does not impact data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-68360 does not affect system availability.

CVE-2025-68360 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-68360: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-15166 – A vulnerability was found in itsourcecode Online Cake Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /updatesupplier.php?action=...
  • CVE-2025-15165 – A vulnerability has been found in itsourcecode Online Cake Ordering System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /updatecust...
  • CVE-2025-15164 – A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This affects an unknown part of the file /goform/SafeMacFilter. The manipulation of th...
  • CVE-2025-15163 – A vulnerability was identified in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /goform/SafeEmailFilter. T...
  • CVE-2025-15067 – Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in Innorix Innorix WP allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects In...