CVE-2025-59694 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-59694
Vulnerability Scoring

6.8
/10
High Risk

If left unpatched, CVE-2025-59694 could lead to major system disruptions or data loss.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Physical
    Physical access is required to exploit this vulnerability.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-59694 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕓 26 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC
Originally published on: 🕒 02 Dec 2025, 15:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 267 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE-2025-59694 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-59694: The Chassis Management Board in Entrust nShield Connect XC, nShield 5c, and nShield HSMi through 13.6.11, or 13.7 (patched in 13.6.12 (LTS) and 13.9.0 (STS)), allows a physically proximate attacker to persistently modify firmware and influence the (insecurely configured) appliance boot process. To exploit this, the attacker must modify the firmware via JTAG or perform an upgrade to the chassis management board firmware. This is called F03.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-59694

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-59694 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-59694

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2025-59694 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-59694, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-59694, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2025-59694 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: High
    CVE-2025-59694 could allow unauthorized modifications to data, potentially affecting system reliability and trust.
  • Availability: High
    CVE-2025-59694 can disrupt system operations, potentially causing complete denial of service (DoS).

CVE-2025-59694 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-1274

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Infected Memory CAPEC-456 An adversary inserts malicious logic into memory enabling them to achieve a negative impact. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems that are still under development and part of the supply chain.
  • Exploitation of Improperly Configured or Implemented Memory Protections CAPEC-679 An adversary takes advantage of missing or incorrectly configured access control within memory to read/write data or inject malicious code into said memory.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_5c_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_5c_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_5c_firmware:13.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_5c_firmware:13.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:entrust:nshield_5c:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:entrust:nshield_5c:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_hsmi_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_hsmi_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_hsmi_firmware:13.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_hsmi_firmware:13.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:entrust:nshield_hsmi:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:entrust:nshield_hsmi:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_base_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_base_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_base_firmware:13.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_base_firmware:13.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_base:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_base:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_mid_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_mid_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_mid_firmware:13.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_mid_firmware:13.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_mid:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_mid:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_high_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_high_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_high_firmware:13.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_high_firmware:13.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_high:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:entrust:nshield_connect_xc_high:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-59694: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-90560 – zstd-jni versions 1.2.0 through 1.5.7-13 contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the ZstdDictDecompress constructor because offset and lengt...
  • CVE-2026-90559 – snappy-java through 1.1.10.8 contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Snappy.uncompress(ByteBuffer, ByteBuffer) because destination buffer ...
  • CVE-2026-90558 – sngrep through 1.8.4 contains stack buffer overflow vulnerabilities in SIP attribute formatting routines when header values exceed the 255-byte buf...
  • CVE-2026-90557 – Freeciv versions 3.1.0 through 3.2.5 contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in sg_load_player_unit() when processing savegame files with inval...
  • CVE-2026-90556 – Freeciv versions before 3.2.6 contain a heap buffer overflow in worklist_load() when processing savegame files with declared worklist lengths excee...