CVE-2025-46651 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-46651
Vulnerability Scoring

4.3
/10
Medium Risk

The vulnerability CVE-2025-46651 could compromise system integrity but typically requires user interaction to be exploited.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: Low
    Some privileges are necessary to exploit the vulnerability.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-46651 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕣 10 Feb 2026, 20:53 UTC
Originally published on: 🕕 03 Feb 2026, 18:16 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 7 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

CVE-2025-46651 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-46651: Tiny File Manager through 2.6 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the URL upload feature. Due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs, an attacker can send crafted requests to localhost by using http://www.127.0.0.1.example.com/ or a similarly constructed domain name. This may lead to unauthorized port scanning or access to internal-only services.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-46651

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-46651 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-46651

CVE-2025-46651 presents an accessible attack vector with minimal effort required. Restricting access controls and implementing security updates are critical to reducing exploitation risks.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-46651, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-46651, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: Low
    CVE-2025-46651 could lead to minor leaks of non-critical information without major privacy breaches.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2025-46651 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-46651 does not impact system availability.

CVE-2025-46651 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Server Side Request Forgery CAPEC-664 An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.3.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.3.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.3.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.3.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.5.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.5.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:prasathmani:tiny_file_manager:2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-46651: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-2562 – A vulnerability was determined in JingDong JD Cloud Box AX6600 up to 4.5.1.r4533. This impacts the function cast_streen of the file /jdcapi of the ...
  • CVE-2026-2561 – A vulnerability was found in JingDong JD Cloud Box AX6600 up to 4.5.1.r4533. This affects the function web_get_ddns_uptime of the file /jdcapi of t...
  • CVE-2026-2447 – Heap buffer overflow in libvpx. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 147.0.4, Firefox ESR < 140.7.1, and Firefox ESR < 115.32.1.
  • CVE-2026-2032 – Malicious scripts that interrupt new tab page loading could cause desynchronization between the address bar and page content, allowing the attacker...
  • CVE-2026-2560 – A vulnerability has been found in kalcaddle kodbox up to 1.64.05. The impacted element is the function run of the file plugins/fileThumb/lib/VideoR...