CVE-2025-40205
Vulnerability Scoring
Analysis In Progress
CVE-2025-40205 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details
CVE-2025-40205
Attack Complexity Details
-
Attack Complexity:
Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
-
Attack Vector:
Attack Vector Under Analysis
-
Privileges Required:
None
No authentication is required for exploitation.
-
Scope:
Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
-
User Interaction:
None
No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.
CVE-2025-40205 Details
Status: Awaiting Analysis
Last updated: 🕟 14 Nov 2025, 16:42 UTC
Originally published on: 🕙 12 Nov 2025, 22:15 UTC
Time between publication and last update: 1 days
CVSS Release:
CVE-2025-40205 Vulnerability Summary
CVE-2025-40205: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: avoid potential out-of-bounds in btrfs_encode_fh() The function btrfs_encode_fh() does not properly account for the three cases it handles. Before writing to the file handle (fh), the function only returns to the user BTRFS_FID_SIZE_NON_CONNECTABLE (5 dwords, 20 bytes) or BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE (8 dwords, 32 bytes). However, when a parent exists and the root ID of the parent and the inode are different, the function writes BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE_ROOT (10 dwords, 40 bytes). If *max_len is not large enough, this write goes out of bounds because BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE_ROOT is greater than BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE originally returned. This results in an 8-byte out-of-bounds write at fid->parent_root_objectid = parent_root_id. A previous attempt to fix this issue was made but was lost. https://lore.kernel.org/all/4CADAEEC020000780001B32C@vpn.id2.novell.com/ Although this issue does not seem to be easily triggerable, it is a potential memory corruption bug that should be fixed. This patch resolves the issue by ensuring the function returns the appropriate size for all three cases and validates that *max_len is large enough before writing any data.
Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-40205
Access Complexity Graph
The exploitability of CVE-2025-40205 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).
Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-40205
No exploitability data is available for CVE-2025-40205.
Understanding AC and PR
A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.
Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.
Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.
CVSS Score Breakdown Chart
Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-40205, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.
CIA Impact Analysis
Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-40205, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.
-
Confidentiality:
None
CVE-2025-40205 does not compromise confidentiality.
-
Integrity:
None
CVE-2025-40205 does not impact data integrity.
-
Availability:
None
CVE-2025-40205 does not affect system availability.
CVE-2025-40205 References
External References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0276c8582488022f057b4cec21975a5edf079f47
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/361d67276eb8ec6be8f27f4ad6c6090459438fee
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43143776b0a7604d873d1a6f3e552a00aa930224
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60de2f55d2aca53e81b4ef2a67d7cc9e1eb677db
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/742b44342204e5dfe3926433823623c1a0c581df
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3a9a8e1275eb9b87f006b5562a287aea3f6885f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d91f6626133698362bba08fbc04bd72c466806d3
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dff4f9ff5d7f289e4545cc936362e01ed3252742
CWE Common Weakness Enumeration
Unknown
Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-40205: Combat Critical CVE Threats
Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.
Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-23039 – In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/gud: fix NULL fb and crtc dereferences on USB disconnect On disconnect dr...
- CVE-2026-23038 – In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pnfs/flexfiles: Fix memory leak in nfs4_ff_alloc_deviceid_node() In nfs4_ff_a...
- CVE-2026-23037 – In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: etas_es58x: allow partial RX URB allocation to succeed When es58x_alloc_...
- CVE-2026-23036 – In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: release path before iget_failed() in btrfs_read_locked_inode() In btrf...
- CVE-2026-23035 – In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Pass netdev to mlx5e_destroy_netdev instead of priv mlx5e_priv is ...