CVE-2025-39821 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-39821
Vulnerability Scoring

7.8
/10
Very High Risk

Highly exploitable, CVE-2025-39821 poses a critical security risk that could lead to severe breaches.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Local
    Vulnerability requires local system access.
  • Privileges Required: Low
    Some privileges are necessary to exploit the vulnerability.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-39821 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕡 02 Dec 2025, 18:35 UTC
Originally published on: 🕐 16 Sep 2025, 13:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 77 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE-2025-39821 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-39821: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf: Avoid undefined behavior from stopping/starting inactive events Calling pmu->start()/stop() on perf events in PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF can leave event->hw.idx at -1. When PMU drivers later attempt to use this negative index as a shift exponent in bitwise operations, it leads to UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds reports. The issue is a logical flaw in how event groups handle throttling when some members are intentionally disabled. Based on the analysis and the reproducer provided by Mark Rutland (this issue on both arm64 and x86-64). The scenario unfolds as follows: 1. A group leader event is configured with a very aggressive sampling period (e.g., sample_period = 1). This causes frequent interrupts and triggers the throttling mechanism. 2. A child event in the same group is created in a disabled state (.disabled = 1). This event remains in PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF. Since it hasn't been scheduled onto the PMU, its event->hw.idx remains initialized at -1. 3. When throttling occurs, perf_event_throttle_group() and later perf_event_unthrottle_group() iterate through all siblings, including the disabled child event. 4. perf_event_throttle()/unthrottle() are called on this inactive child event, which then call event->pmu->start()/stop(). 5. The PMU driver receives the event with hw.idx == -1 and attempts to use it as a shift exponent. e.g., in macros like PMCNTENSET(idx), leading to the UBSAN report. The throttling mechanism attempts to start/stop events that are not actively scheduled on the hardware. Move the state check into perf_event_throttle()/perf_event_unthrottle() so that inactive events are skipped entirely. This ensures only active events with a valid hw.idx are processed, preventing undefined behavior and silencing UBSAN warnings. The corrected check ensures true before proceeding with PMU operations. The problem can be reproduced with the syzkaller reproducer:

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-39821

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-39821 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-39821

CVE-2025-39821 presents an accessible attack vector with minimal effort required. Restricting access controls and implementing security updates are critical to reducing exploitation risks.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-39821, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-39821, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2025-39821 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: High
    CVE-2025-39821 could allow unauthorized modifications to data, potentially affecting system reliability and trust.
  • Availability: High
    CVE-2025-39821 can disrupt system operations, potentially causing complete denial of service (DoS).

CVE-2025-39821 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-787

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.17:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.17:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.17:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.17:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-39821: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-14298 – The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` ...
  • CVE-2025-12492 – The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerab...
  • CVE-2025-13619 – The Flex Store Users plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to the 'fs...
  • CVE-2025-12820 – The Pure WC Variation Swatches WordPress plugin through 1.1.7 does not have an authorization check when updating its settings, which could allow an...
  • CVE-2025-14735 – The "Amazon affiliate lite Plugin" plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and ...