CVE-2025-38589 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-38589
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress
Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity:
    Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
  • Attack Vector:
    Attack Vector Under Analysis
  • Privileges Required: None
    No authentication is required for exploitation.
  • Scope:
    Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-38589 Details

Status: Awaiting Analysis

Last updated: 🕝 20 Aug 2025, 14:40 UTC
Originally published on: 🕔 19 Aug 2025, 17:15 UTC

CVSS Release:

CVE-2025-38589 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-38589: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: neighbour: Fix null-ptr-deref in neigh_flush_dev(). kernel test robot reported null-ptr-deref in neigh_flush_dev(). [0] The cited commit introduced per-netdev neighbour list and converted neigh_flush_dev() to use it instead of the global hash table. One thing we missed is that neigh_table_clear() calls neigh_ifdown() with NULL dev. Let's restore the hash table iteration. Note that IPv6 module is no longer unloadable, so neigh_table_clear() is called only when IPv6 fails to initialise, which is unlikely to happen. [0]: IPv6: Attempt to unregister permanent protocol 136 IPv6: Attempt to unregister permanent protocol 17 Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000001a0: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000d00-0x0000000000000d07] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G T 6.12.0-rc6-01246-gf7f52738637f #1 Tainted: [T]=RANDSTRUCT Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:neigh_flush_dev.llvm.6395807810224103582+0x52/0x570 Code: c1 e8 03 42 8a 04 38 84 c0 0f 85 15 05 00 00 31 c0 41 83 3e 0a 0f 94 c0 48 8d 1c c3 48 81 c3 f8 0c 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 80 3c 38 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 f7 49 93 fe 4c 8b 3b 4d 85 ff 0f RSP: 0000:ffff88810026f408 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 00000000000001a0 RBX: 0000000000000d00 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffffc0631640 RBP: ffff88810026f470 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffffffffc0625250 R14: ffffffffc0631640 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 00007f575cb83940(0000) GS:ffff8883aee00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f575db40008 CR3: 00000002bf936000 CR4: 00000000000406f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __neigh_ifdown.llvm.6395807810224103582+0x44/0x390 neigh_table_clear+0xb1/0x268 ndisc_cleanup+0x21/0x38 [ipv6] init_module+0x2f5/0x468 [ipv6] do_one_initcall+0x1ba/0x628 do_init_module+0x21a/0x530 load_module+0x2550/0x2ea0 __se_sys_finit_module+0x3d2/0x620 __x64_sys_finit_module+0x76/0x88 x64_sys_call+0x7ff/0xde8 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x1e8 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f RIP: 0033:0x7f575d6f2719 Code: 08 89 e8 5b 5d c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d b7 06 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fff82a2a268 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000557827b45310 RCX: 00007f575d6f2719 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007f575d584efd RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007f575d584efd R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000557827b47b00 R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000020000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000557827b470e0 R15: 00007f575dbb4270 </TASK> Modules linked in: ipv6(+)

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-38589

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-38589 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-38589

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2025-38589.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-38589, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-38589, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2025-38589 does not compromise confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2025-38589 does not impact data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-38589 does not affect system availability.

CVE-2025-38589 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-38589: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-62672 – rplay through 3.3.2 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (SIGSEGV and daemon crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact. This occurs...
  • CVE-2025-47410 – Apache Geode is vulnerable to CSRF attacks through GET requests to the Management and Monitoring REST API that could allow an attacker who has tric...
  • CVE-2025-11926 – The Related Posts Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 1...
  • CVE-2025-9890 – The Theme Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0. This is due to missing...
  • CVE-2025-5555 – A vulnerability has been found in Nixdorf Wincor PORT IO Driver up to 1.0.0.1. This affects the function sub_11100 in the library wnport.sys of the...