CVE-2025-37765 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-37765
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress
Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity:
    Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
  • Attack Vector:
    Attack Vector Under Analysis
  • Privileges Required: None
    No authentication is required for exploitation.
  • Scope:
    Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-37765 Details

Status: Awaiting Analysis

Last updated: 🕜 02 May 2025, 13:53 UTC
Originally published on: 🕑 01 May 2025, 14:15 UTC

CVSS Release:

CVE-2025-37765 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-37765: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/nouveau: prime: fix ttm_bo_delayed_delete oops Fix an oops in ttm_bo_delayed_delete which results from dererencing a dangling pointer: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b7b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 1082 Comm: kworker/u65:2 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc4-00267-g505460b44513-dirty #216 Hardware name: LENOVO 82N6/LNVNB161216, BIOS GKCN65WW 01/16/2024 Workqueue: ttm ttm_bo_delayed_delete [ttm] RIP: 0010:dma_resv_iter_first_unlocked+0x55/0x290 Code: 31 f6 48 c7 c7 00 2b fa aa e8 97 bd 52 ff e8 a2 c1 53 00 5a 85 c0 74 48 e9 88 01 00 00 4c 89 63 20 4d 85 e4 0f 84 30 01 00 00 <41> 8b 44 24 10 c6 43 2c 01 48 89 df 89 43 28 e8 97 fd ff ff 4c 8b RSP: 0018:ffffbf9383473d60 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffffbf9383473d88 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffbf9383473d78 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b R13: ffffa003bbf78580 R14: ffffa003a6728040 R15: 00000000000383cc FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa00991c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000758348024dd0 CR3: 000000012c259000 CR4: 0000000000f50ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x26 ? die_addr+0x3d/0x70 ? exc_general_protection+0x159/0x460 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x27/0x30 ? dma_resv_iter_first_unlocked+0x55/0x290 dma_resv_wait_timeout+0x56/0x100 ttm_bo_delayed_delete+0x69/0xb0 [ttm] process_one_work+0x217/0x5c0 worker_thread+0x1c8/0x3d0 ? apply_wqattrs_cleanup.part.0+0xc0/0xc0 kthread+0x10b/0x240 ? kthreads_online_cpu+0x140/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x40/0x70 ? kthreads_online_cpu+0x140/0x140 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK> The cause of this is: - drm_prime_gem_destroy calls dma_buf_put(dma_buf) which releases the reference to the shared dma_buf. The reference count is 0, so the dma_buf is destroyed, which in turn decrements the corresponding amdgpu_bo reference count to 0, and the amdgpu_bo is destroyed - calling drm_gem_object_release then dma_resv_fini (which destroys the reservation object), then finally freeing the amdgpu_bo. - nouveau_bo obj->bo.base.resv is now a dangling pointer to the memory formerly allocated to the amdgpu_bo. - nouveau_gem_object_del calls ttm_bo_put(&nvbo->bo) which calls ttm_bo_release, which schedules ttm_bo_delayed_delete. - ttm_bo_delayed_delete runs and dereferences the dangling resv pointer, resulting in a general protection fault. Fix this by moving the drm_prime_gem_destroy call from nouveau_gem_object_del to nouveau_bo_del_ttm. This ensures that it will be run after ttm_bo_delayed_delete.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-37765

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-37765 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-37765

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2025-37765.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-37765, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-37765, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2025-37765 does not compromise confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2025-37765 does not impact data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-37765 does not affect system availability.

CVE-2025-37765 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-37765: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-5440 – A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Linksys RE6500, RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE7000 and RE9000 1.0.013.001/1.0.04.001/1.0.04.00...
  • CVE-2025-5439 – A vulnerability was found in Linksys RE6500, RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE7000 and RE9000 1.0.013.001/1.0.04.001/1.0.04.002/1.1.05.003/1.2.07.001. It ...
  • CVE-2025-3260 – A security vulnerability in the /apis/dashboard.grafana.app/* endpoints allows authenticated users to bypass dashboard and folder permissions. The ...
  • CVE-2025-1750 – An SQL injection vulnerability exists in the delete function of DuckDBVectorStore in run-llama/llama_index version v0.12.19. This vulnerability all...
  • CVE-2025-5455 – An issue was found in the private API function qDecodeDataUrl() in QtCore, which is used in QTextDocument and QNetworkReply, and, potentially, in u...