CVE-2025-2866 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-2866
Vulnerability Scoring

5.5
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2025-2866 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Local
    Vulnerability requires local system access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: Required
    User interaction is necessary for successful exploitation.

CVE-2025-2866 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕘 03 Jul 2025, 21:26 UTC
Originally published on: 🕖 27 Apr 2025, 19:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 67 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

CVE-2025-2866 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-2866: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in LibreOffice allows PDF Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation. In the affected versions of LibreOffice a flaw in the verification code for adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures could cause invalid signatures to be accepted as valid This issue affects LibreOffice: from 24.8 before < 24.8.6, from 25.2 before < 25.2.2.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-2866

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-2866 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-2866

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2025-2866 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-2866, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-2866, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2025-2866 has no significant impact on data confidentiality.
  • Integrity: High
    CVE-2025-2866 could allow unauthorized modifications to data, potentially affecting system reliability and trust.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-2866 does not impact system availability.

CVE-2025-2866 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-347

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Padding Oracle Crypto Attack CAPEC-463 An adversary is able to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key if a target system leaks data on whether or not a padding error happened while decrypting the ciphertext. A target system that leaks this type of information becomes the padding oracle and an adversary is able to make use of that oracle to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key by issuing on average 128*b calls to the padding oracle (where b is the number of bytes in the ciphertext block). In addition to performing decryption, an adversary is also able to produce valid ciphertexts (i.e., perform encryption) by using the padding oracle, all without knowing the encryption key.
  • Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation CAPEC-475 An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.0.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.0.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.0.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:24.8.0.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:25.2.0.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:25.2.0.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:25.2.0.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:libreoffice:libreoffice:25.2.0.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-2866: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-54792 – LocalSend is an open-source app to securely share files and messages with nearby devices over local networks without needing an internet connection...
  • CVE-2025-54424 – 1Panel is a web interface and MCP Server that manages websites, files, containers, databases, and LLMs on a Linux server. In versions 2.0.5 and bel...
  • CVE-2025-54132 – Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. In versions below 1.3, Mermaid (which is used to render diagrams) allows embedding images wh...
  • CVE-2025-54131 – Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. In versions below 1.3, an attacker can bypass the allow list in auto-run mode with a backtic...
  • CVE-2024-13978 – A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF up to 4.7.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function t2p_read_tiff...