CVE-2025-27432 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-27432
Vulnerability Scoring

2.4
/10
Low Risk

Security experts classify CVE-2025-27432 as a minor vulnerability with limited consequences.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Adjacent_network
    Attack Vector Under Analysis
  • Privileges Required: High
    High-level privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-27432 Details

Status: Received on 11 Mar 2025, 01:15 UTC

Published on: 11 Mar 2025, 01:15 UTC

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

cna@sap.com

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

CVE-2025-27432 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-27432: The eDocument Cockpit (Inbound NF-e) in SAP Electronic Invoicing for Brazil allows an authenticated attacker with certain privileges to gain unauthorized access to each transaction. By executing the specific ABAP method within the ABAP system, an unauthorized attacker could call each transaction and view the inbound delivery details. This vulnerability has a low impact on the confidentiality with no effect on the integrity and the availability of the application.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-27432

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-27432 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-27432

The exploitability of CVE-2025-27432 is influenced by multiple factors. Security teams should analyze system configurations and apply appropriate countermeasures to mitigate threats.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-27432, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-27432, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: Low
    CVE-2025-27432 could lead to minor leaks of non-critical information without major privacy breaches.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2025-27432 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-27432 does not impact system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.043% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 12.0% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 88.0% of others.

CVE-2025-27432 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-862

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws CAPEC-665 An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-27432: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-30073 – An issue was discovered in OPC cardsystems Webapp Aufwertung 2.1.0. The reference assigned to transactions can be reused. When completing a payment...
  • CVE-2025-28361 – Unauthorized stack overflow vulnerability in Telesquare TLR-2005KSH v.1.1.4 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the system...
  • CVE-2025-26011 – Telesquare TLR-2005KSH 1.1.4 has an unauthorized stack overflow vulnerability when requesting the admin.cgi parameter with setUsernamePassword.
  • CVE-2025-26010 – Telesquare TLR-2005KSH 1.1.4 allows unauthorized password modification when requesting the admin.cgi parameter with setUserNamePassword.
  • CVE-2025-26009 – Telesquare TLR-2005KSH 1.1.4 has an Information Disclosure vulnerability when requesting systemutilit.cgi.