CVE-2025-27296 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-27296
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress
Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity:
    Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
  • Attack Vector:
    Attack Vector Under Analysis
  • Privileges Required: None
    No authentication is required for exploitation.
  • Scope:
    Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-27296 Details

Status: Awaiting Analysis

Last updated: 🕔 01 Apr 2026, 17:19 UTC
Originally published on: 🕒 24 Feb 2025, 15:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 401 days

CVSS Release:

CVSS3 Source

audit@patchstack.com

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE-2025-27296 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-27296: Missing Authorization vulnerability in revenueflex Auto Ad Inserter – Increase Google Adsense and Ad Manager Revenue revenueflex-easy-ads allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Auto Ad Inserter – Increase Google Adsense and Ad Manager Revenue: from n/a through <= 1.5.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-27296

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-27296 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-27296

The exploitability of CVE-2025-27296 is influenced by multiple factors. Security teams should analyze system configurations and apply appropriate countermeasures to mitigate threats.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-27296, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-27296, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2025-27296 does not compromise confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2025-27296 does not impact data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-27296 does not affect system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.043% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 12.0% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 88.0% of others.

CVE-2025-27296 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-862

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws CAPEC-665 An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-27296: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-5594 – A weakness has been identified in premAI-io premsql up to 0.2.1. Affected is the function eval of the file premsql/agents/baseline/workers/followup...
  • CVE-2026-5587 – A vulnerability was identified in wbbeyourself MAC-SQL up to 31a9df5e0d520be4769be57a4b9022e5e34a14f4. This affects the function _execute_sql of th...
  • CVE-2026-5586 – A vulnerability was determined in zhongyu09 openchatbi up to 0.2.1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Multi-stage Text2S...
  • CVE-2026-5585 – A vulnerability was found in Tencent AI-Infra-Guard 4.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file common/websocket/task_manager.go o...
  • CVE-2026-5584 – A vulnerability has been found in Fosowl agenticSeek 0.1.0. Impacted is the function PyInterpreter.execute of the file sources/tools/PyInterpreter....