CVE-2025-27090 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-27090
Vulnerability Scoring

5.3
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2025-27090 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-27090 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕗 27 Feb 2025, 20:18 UTC
Originally published on: 🕙 19 Feb 2025, 22:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 7 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

CVE-2025-27090 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-27090: Sliver is an open source cross-platform adversary emulation/red team framework, it can be used by organizations of all sizes to perform security testing. The reverse port forwarding in sliver teamserver allows the implant to open a reverse tunnel on the sliver teamserver without verifying if the operator instructed the implant to do so. The only impact that has been shown is the exposure of the server's IP address to a third party. This issue has been addressed in version 1.5.43 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-27090

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-27090 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-27090

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2025-27090 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-27090, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-27090, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: Low
    CVE-2025-27090 could lead to minor leaks of non-critical information without major privacy breaches.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2025-27090 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-27090 does not impact system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.052% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 23.92% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 76.08% of others.

CVE-2025-27090 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Server Side Request Forgery CAPEC-664 An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.26:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.26:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.27:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.27:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.28:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.28:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.29:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.29:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.30:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.30:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.31:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.31:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.32:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.32:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.33:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.33:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.34:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.34:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.35:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.35:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.36:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.36:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.37:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.37:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.38:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.38:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.39:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.39:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.40:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.40:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.41:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:bishopfox:sliver:1.5.41:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-27090: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-27636 – Bypass/Injection vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 through <= 4.10.1, from 4.8.0 through <= 4.8.4, from ...
  • CVE-2025-2121 – A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Thinkware Car Dashcam F800 Pro up to 20250226. Affected is an unknown function of the comp...
  • CVE-2025-2120 – A vulnerability was found in Thinkware Car Dashcam F800 Pro up to 20250226. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown proce...
  • CVE-2025-2119 – A vulnerability was found in Thinkware Car Dashcam F800 Pro up to 20250226. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown...
  • CVE-2025-2118 – A vulnerability was found in Quantico Tecnologia PRMV 6.48. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/log...