CVE-2025-26487 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-26487
Vulnerability Scoring

8.6
/10
Severe Risk

Cybersecurity professionals consider CVE-2025-26487 an immediate threat requiring urgent mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Changed
    Successful exploitation can impact components beyond the vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-26487 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕡 22 Dec 2025, 18:56 UTC
Originally published on: 🕘 08 Dec 2025, 09:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 14 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

CVE-2025-26487 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-26487: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Infinera MTC-9 version allows remote unauthenticated users to gain access to other network resources using HTTPS requests through the appliance used as a bridge.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-26487

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-26487 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-26487

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2025-26487 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-26487, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-26487, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2025-26487 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2025-26487 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-26487 does not impact system availability.

CVE-2025-26487 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Server Side Request Forgery CAPEC-664 An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:h:nokia:infinera_mtc-9:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:nokia:infinera_mtc-9:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-26487: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-24515 – In libexpat before 2.7.4, XML_ExternalEntityParserCreate does not copy unknown encoding handler user data.
  • CVE-2026-0603 – A flaw was found in Hibernate. A remote attacker with low privileges could exploit a second-order SQL injection vulnerability by providing speciall...
  • CVE-2024-11976 – The The BuddyPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 14.3.3. This is due to...
  • CVE-2026-0927 – The KiviCare – Clinic & Patient Management System (EHR) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing authorization c...
  • CVE-2025-14745 – The RSS Aggregator – RSS Import, News Feeds, Feed to Post, and Autoblogging plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via t...