CVE-2025-25827 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-25827
Vulnerability Scoring

6.8
/10
High Risk

If left unpatched, CVE-2025-25827 could lead to major system disruptions or data loss.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Local
    Vulnerability requires local system access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-25827 Details

Status: Awaiting Analysis

Last updated: 🕘 06 Mar 2025, 21:15 UTC
Originally published on: 🕒 26 Feb 2025, 15:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 8 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

CVE-2025-25827 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-25827: A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the component sort.php of Emlog Pro v2.5.4 allows attackers to scan local and internal ports via supplying a crafted URL.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-25827

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-25827 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-25827

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2025-25827 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-25827, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-25827, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2025-25827 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: Low
    Exploiting CVE-2025-25827 may cause minor changes to data without severely impacting its accuracy.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-25827 does not impact system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.062% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 29.54% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 70.46000000000001% of others.

CVE-2025-25827 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Server Side Request Forgery CAPEC-664 An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-25827: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-30073 – An issue was discovered in OPC cardsystems Webapp Aufwertung 2.1.0. The reference assigned to transactions can be reused. When completing a payment...
  • CVE-2025-28361 – Unauthorized stack overflow vulnerability in Telesquare TLR-2005KSH v.1.1.4 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the system...
  • CVE-2025-26011 – Telesquare TLR-2005KSH 1.1.4 has an unauthorized stack overflow vulnerability when requesting the admin.cgi parameter with setUsernamePassword.
  • CVE-2025-26010 – Telesquare TLR-2005KSH 1.1.4 allows unauthorized password modification when requesting the admin.cgi parameter with setUserNamePassword.
  • CVE-2025-26009 – Telesquare TLR-2005KSH 1.1.4 has an Information Disclosure vulnerability when requesting systemutilit.cgi.