CVE-2025-11650 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-11650
Vulnerability Scoring

1.8
/10
Very Low Risk

With a negligible impact on system security, CVE-2025-11650 is unlikely to be exploited and generally requires no immediate action.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: High
    Exploits require significant effort and special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Physical
    Physical access is required to exploit this vulnerability.
  • Privileges Required: Low
    Some privileges are necessary to exploit the vulnerability.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-11650 Details

Status: Received on 12 Oct 2025, 23:15 UTC

Published on: 12 Oct 2025, 23:15 UTC

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

cna@vuldb.com

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

CVE-2025-11650 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-11650: A vulnerability was determined in Tomofun Furbo 360 and Furbo Mini. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /etc/shadow of the component Password Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of weak hash. The physical device can be targeted for the attack. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The firmware versions determined to be affected are Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036 and Furbo Mini up to MC0020_FW_074. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-11650

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-11650 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-11650

This vulnerability, CVE-2025-11650, requires a high level of attack complexity and low privileges, making it difficult but not impossible to exploit. Organizations should ensure robust security configurations to mitigate risks.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-11650, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-11650, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: Low
    CVE-2025-11650 could lead to minor leaks of non-critical information without major privacy breaches.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2025-11650 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2025-11650 does not impact system availability.

CVE-2025-11650 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-328

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Web Services API Signature Forgery Leveraging Hash Function Extension Weakness CAPEC-461 An adversary utilizes a hash function extension/padding weakness, to modify the parameters passed to the web service requesting authentication by generating their own call in order to generate a legitimate signature hash (as described in the notes), without knowledge of the secret token sometimes provided by the web service.
  • Subvert Code-signing Facilities CAPEC-68 Many languages use code signing facilities to vouch for code's identity and to thus tie code to its assigned privileges within an environment. Subverting this mechanism can be instrumental in an attacker escalating privilege. Any means of subverting the way that a virtual machine enforces code signing classifies for this style of attack.

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-11650: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-11655 – A security flaw has been discovered in Total.js Flow up to 673ef9144dd25d4f4fd4fdfda5af27f230198924. The impacted element is an unknown function of...
  • CVE-2025-36087 – IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0 through 10.0.9, 11.0.0, IBM Verify Identity Access Container 10.0.0 through 10.0.9, and 11.0.0, under certain con...
  • CVE-2025-11654 – A vulnerability was identified in yousaf530 Inferno Online Clothing Store up to 827dd42bfbe380e8de76fdc67958c24cf1246208. The affected element is a...
  • CVE-2025-11653 – A vulnerability was determined in UTT HiPER 2620G up to 3.1.4. Impacted is the function strcpy of the file /goform/fNTP. This manipulation of the a...
  • CVE-2025-11652 – A vulnerability was found in UTT 进取 518G up to V3v3.2.7-210919-161313. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /goform/formTaskEdit_...