CVE-2025-10395 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2025-10395
Vulnerability Scoring

4.7
/10
Medium Risk

The vulnerability CVE-2025-10395 could compromise system integrity but typically requires user interaction to be exploited.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: High
    High-level privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2025-10395 Details

Status: Received on 14 Sep 2025, 08:15 UTC

Published on: 14 Sep 2025, 08:15 UTC

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

cna@vuldb.com

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

CVE-2025-10395 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2025-10395: A vulnerability was found in Magicblack MacCMS 2025.1000.4050. Affected by this vulnerability is the function col_url of the component Scheduled Task Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument cjurl results in server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2025-10395

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2025-10395 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2025-10395

The exploitability of CVE-2025-10395 is influenced by multiple factors. Security teams should analyze system configurations and apply appropriate countermeasures to mitigate threats.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2025-10395, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2025-10395, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: Low
    CVE-2025-10395 could lead to minor leaks of non-critical information without major privacy breaches.
  • Integrity: Low
    Exploiting CVE-2025-10395 may cause minor changes to data without severely impacting its accuracy.
  • Availability: Low
    CVE-2025-10395 may slightly degrade system performance without fully affecting service availability.

CVE-2025-10395 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Server Side Request Forgery CAPEC-664 An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2025-10395: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-10396 – A vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester Pet Grooming Management Software 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the ...
  • CVE-2025-10395 – A vulnerability was found in Magicblack MacCMS 2025.1000.4050. Affected by this vulnerability is the function col_url of the component Scheduled Ta...
  • CVE-2025-10394 – A vulnerability has been found in fcba_zzm ics-park Smart Park Management System 2.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file ruoyi-quartz/src/...
  • CVE-2025-10393 – A flaw has been found in miurla morphic up to 0.4.5. This impacts the function fetchHtml of the file /api/advanced-search of the component HTTP Sta...
  • CVE-2025-10392 – A vulnerability was detected in Mercury KM08-708H GiGA WiFi Wave2 1.1.14. This affects an unknown function of the component HTTP Header Handler. Th...