CVE-2024-57897 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2024-57897
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

Attack Complexity:
Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
Attack Vector:
Attack Vector Under Analysis
Privileges Required: None
No authentication is required for exploitation.
Scope:
Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
User Interaction: None
No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2024-57897 Details

Status: Received on 15 Jan 2025, 13:15 UTC

Published on: 15 Jan 2025, 13:15 UTC

CVSS Release:

CVE-2024-57897 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2024-57897: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Correct the migration DMA map direction The SVM DMA device map direction should be set the same as the DMA unmap setting, otherwise the DMA core will report the following warning. Before finialize this solution, there're some discussion on the DMA mapping type(stream-based or coherent) in this KFD migration case, followed by https://lore.kernel.org/all/04d4ab32 -45a1-4b88-86ee-fb0f35a0ca40@amd.com/T/. As there's no dma_sync_single_for_*() in the DMA buffer accessed that because this migration operation should be sync properly and automatically. Give that there's might not be a performance problem in various cache sync policy of DMA sync. Therefore, in order to simplify the DMA direction setting alignment, let's set the DMA map direction as BIDIRECTIONAL. [ 150.834218] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1812 at kernel/dma/debug.c:1028 check_unmap+0x1cc/0x930 [ 150.834225] Modules linked in: amdgpu(OE) amdxcp drm_exec(OE) gpu_sched drm_buddy(OE) drm_ttm_helper(OE) ttm(OE) drm_suballoc_helper(OE) drm_display_helper(OE) drm_kms_helper(OE) i2c_algo_bit rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 nfs lockd grace netfs xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat xt_addrtype iptable_filter br_netfilter nvme_fabrics overlay nfnetlink_cttimeout nfnetlink openvswitch nsh nf_conncount nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c bridge stp llc sch_fq_codel intel_rapl_msr amd_atl intel_rapl_common snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_scodec_component snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg edac_mce_amd snd_pci_acp6x snd_hda_codec snd_acp_config snd_hda_core snd_hwdep snd_soc_acpi kvm_amd sunrpc snd_pcm kvm binfmt_misc snd_seq_midi crct10dif_pclmul snd_seq_midi_event ghash_clmulni_intel sha512_ssse3 snd_rawmidi nls_iso8859_1 sha256_ssse3 sha1_ssse3 snd_seq aesni_intel snd_seq_device crypto_simd snd_timer cryptd input_leds [ 150.834310] wmi_bmof serio_raw k10temp rapl snd sp5100_tco ipmi_devintf soundcore ccp ipmi_msghandler cm32181 industrialio mac_hid msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport efi_pstore drm(OE) ip_tables x_tables pci_stub crc32_pclmul nvme ahci libahci i2c_piix4 r8169 nvme_core i2c_designware_pci realtek i2c_ccgx_ucsi video wmi hid_generic cdc_ether usbnet usbhid hid r8152 mii [ 150.834354] CPU: 8 PID: 1812 Comm: rocrtst64 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-custom #492 [ 150.834358] Hardware name: AMD Majolica-RN/Majolica-RN, BIOS RMJ1009A 06/13/2021 [ 150.834360] RIP: 0010:check_unmap+0x1cc/0x930 [ 150.834363] Code: c0 4c 89 4d c8 e8 34 bf 86 00 4c 8b 4d c8 4c 8b 45 c0 48 8b 4d b8 48 89 c6 41 57 4c 89 ea 48 c7 c7 80 49 b4 84 e8 b4 81 f3 ff <0f> 0b 48 c7 c7 04 83 ac 84 e8 76 ba fc ff 41 8b 76 4c 49 8d 7e 50 [ 150.834365] RSP: 0018:ffffaac5023739e0 EFLAGS: 00010086 [ 150.834368] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff8566a2e0 RCX: 0000000000000027 [ 150.834370] RDX: ffff8f6a8f621688 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8f6a8f621680 [ 150.834372] RBP: ffffaac502373a30 R08: 00000000000000c9 R09: ffffaac502373850 [ 150.834373] R10: ffffaac502373848 R11: ffffffff84f46328 R12: ffffaac502373a40 [ 150.834375] R13: ffff8f6741045330 R14: ffff8f6741a77700 R15: ffffffff84ac831b [ 150.834377] FS: 00007faf0fc94c00(0000) GS:ffff8f6a8f600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 150.834379] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 150.834381] CR2: 00007faf0b600020 CR3: 000000010a52e000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 [ 150.834383] Call Trace: [ 150.834385] <TASK> [ 150.834387] ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80 [ 150.834393] ? __warn+0x8c/0x140 [ 150.834397] ? check_unmap+0x1cc/0x930 [ 150.834400] ? report_bug+0x193/0x1a0 [ 150.834406] ? handle_bug+0x46/0x80 [ 150.834410] ? exc_invalid_op+0x1d/0x80 [ 150.834413] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [ 150.834420] ? check_unmap+0x1cc/0x930 [ 150.834425] debug_dma_unmap_page+0x86/0x90 [ 150.834431] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 150.834435] ---truncated---

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2024-57897

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2024-57897 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2024-57897

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2024-57897.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2024-57897, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2024-57897, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

Confidentiality: None
CVE-2024-57897 does not compromise confidentiality.
Integrity: None
CVE-2024-57897 does not impact data integrity.
Availability: None
CVE-2024-57897 does not affect system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.045% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 18.4% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 81.6% of others.

CVE-2024-57897 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2024-57897: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-3803 – A vulnerability was found in Tenda W12 and i24 3.0.0.4(2887)/3.0.0.5(3644). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function cgiSysSc...
CVE-2025-3802 – A vulnerability was found in Tenda W12 and i24 3.0.0.4(2887)/3.0.0.5(3644). It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects the functi...
CVE-2025-3801 – A vulnerability was found in songquanpeng one-api up to 0.6.10. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the componen...
CVE-2025-3800 – A vulnerability has been found in WCMS 11 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file app/co...
CVE-2025-3799 – A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in WCMS 11. Affected is an unknown function of the file app/controllers/AnonymousContr...