CVE-2024-53178 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2024-53178
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress
Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity:
    Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
  • Attack Vector:
    Attack Vector Under Analysis
  • Privileges Required: None
    No authentication is required for exploitation.
  • Scope:
    Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2024-53178 Details

Status: Received on 27 Dec 2024, 14:15 UTC

Published on: 27 Dec 2024, 14:15 UTC

CVSS Release:

CVE-2024-53178 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2024-53178: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: Don't leak cfid when reconnect races with open_cached_dir open_cached_dir() may either race with the tcon reconnection even before compound_send_recv() or directly trigger a reconnection via SMB2_open_init() or SMB_query_info_init(). The reconnection process invokes invalidate_all_cached_dirs() via cifs_mark_open_files_invalid(), which removes all cfids from the cfids->entries list but doesn't drop a ref if has_lease isn't true. This results in the currently-being-constructed cfid not being on the list, but still having a refcount of 2. It leaks if returned from open_cached_dir(). Fix this by setting cfid->has_lease when the ref is actually taken; the cfid will not be used by other threads until it has a valid time. Addresses these kmemleaks: unreferenced object 0xffff8881090c4000 (size 1024): comm "bash", pid 1860, jiffies 4295126592 hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 01 00 00 00 00 ad de 22 01 00 00 00 00 ad de ........"....... 00 ca 45 22 81 88 ff ff f8 dc 4f 04 81 88 ff ff ..E"......O..... backtrace (crc 6f58c20f): [<ffffffff8b895a1e>] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x2be/0x350 [<ffffffff8bda06e3>] open_cached_dir+0x993/0x1fb0 [<ffffffff8bdaa750>] cifs_readdir+0x15a0/0x1d50 [<ffffffff8b9a853f>] iterate_dir+0x28f/0x4b0 [<ffffffff8b9a9aed>] __x64_sys_getdents64+0xfd/0x200 [<ffffffff8cf6da05>] do_syscall_64+0x95/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8d00012f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e unreferenced object 0xffff8881044fdcf8 (size 8): comm "bash", pid 1860, jiffies 4295126592 hex dump (first 8 bytes): 00 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ........ backtrace (crc 10c106a9): [<ffffffff8b89a3d3>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x363/0x480 [<ffffffff8b7d7256>] kstrdup+0x36/0x60 [<ffffffff8bda0700>] open_cached_dir+0x9b0/0x1fb0 [<ffffffff8bdaa750>] cifs_readdir+0x15a0/0x1d50 [<ffffffff8b9a853f>] iterate_dir+0x28f/0x4b0 [<ffffffff8b9a9aed>] __x64_sys_getdents64+0xfd/0x200 [<ffffffff8cf6da05>] do_syscall_64+0x95/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8d00012f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e And addresses these BUG splats when unmounting the SMB filesystem: BUG: Dentry ffff888140590ba0{i=1000000000080,n=/} still in use (2) [unmount of cifs cifs] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 3433 at fs/dcache.c:1536 umount_check+0xd0/0x100 Modules linked in: CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 3433 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-g850925a8133c-dirty #49 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 11/12/2020 RIP: 0010:umount_check+0xd0/0x100 Code: 8d 7c 24 40 e8 31 5a f4 ff 49 8b 54 24 40 41 56 49 89 e9 45 89 e8 48 89 d9 41 57 48 89 de 48 c7 c7 80 e7 db ac e8 f0 72 9a ff <0f> 0b 58 31 c0 5a 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f e9 2b e5 5d 01 41 RSP: 0018:ffff88811cc27978 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888140590ba0 RCX: ffffffffaaf20bae RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff8881f6fb6f40 RBP: ffff8881462ec000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed1023984ee3 R10: ffff88811cc2771f R11: 00000000016cfcc0 R12: ffff888134383e08 R13: 0000000000000002 R14: ffff8881462ec668 R15: ffffffffaceab4c0 FS: 00007f23bfa98740(0000) GS:ffff8881f6f80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000556de4a6f808 CR3: 0000000123c80000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> d_walk+0x6a/0x530 shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x6a/0x200 generic_shutdown_super+0x52/0x2a0 kill_anon_super+0x22/0x40 cifs_kill_sb+0x159/0x1e0 deactivate_locked_super+0x66/0xe0 cleanup_mnt+0x140/0x210 task_work_run+0xfb/0x170 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x29f/0x2b0 do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f23bfb93ae7 Code: ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 0d 11 93 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bf 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 50 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d e9 92 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 ---truncated---

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2024-53178

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2024-53178 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2024-53178

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2024-53178.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2024-53178, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2024-53178, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2024-53178 does not compromise confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2024-53178 does not impact data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2024-53178 does not affect system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.045% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 18.4% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 81.6% of others.

CVE-2024-53178 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2024-53178: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-4752 – A vulnerability has been found in D-Link DI-7003GV2 24.04.18D1 R(68125) and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown...
  • CVE-2025-4751 – A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in D-Link DI-7003GV2 24.04.18D1 R(68125). Affected is an unknown function of the fi...
  • CVE-2025-4750 – A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in D-Link DI-7003GV2 24.04.18D1 R(68125). This issue affects some unknown proc...
  • CVE-2025-3516 – The Simple Lightbox WordPress plugin before 2.9.4 does not validate and escape some of its attributes before outputting them back in a page/post, w...
  • CVE-2025-3201 – The Contact Form builder with drag & drop for WordPress WordPress plugin before 2.4.3 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which cou...