CVE-2024-36001 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2024-36001
Vulnerability Scoring

7.8
/10
Very High Risk

Highly exploitable, CVE-2024-36001 poses a critical security risk that could lead to severe breaches.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Local
    Vulnerability requires local system access.
  • Privileges Required: Low
    Some privileges are necessary to exploit the vulnerability.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2024-36001 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕡 23 Sep 2025, 18:39 UTC
Originally published on: 🕙 20 May 2024, 10:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 491 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE-2024-36001 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2024-36001: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix the pre-flush when appending to a file in writethrough mode In netfs_perform_write(), when the file is marked NETFS_ICTX_WRITETHROUGH or O_*SYNC or RWF_*SYNC was specified, write-through caching is performed on a buffered file. When setting up for write-through, we flush any conflicting writes in the region and wait for the write to complete, failing if there's a write error to return. The issue arises if we're writing at or above the EOF position because we skip the flush and - more importantly - the wait. This becomes a problem if there's a partial folio at the end of the file that is being written out and we want to make a write to it too. Both the already-running write and the write we start both want to clear the writeback mark, but whoever is second causes a warning looking something like: ------------[ cut here ]------------ R=00000012: folio 11 is not under writeback WARNING: CPU: 34 PID: 654 at fs/netfs/write_collect.c:105 ... CPU: 34 PID: 654 Comm: kworker/u386:27 Tainted: G S ... ... Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_write_collection_worker ... RIP: 0010:netfs_writeback_lookup_folio Fix this by making the flush-and-wait unconditional. It will do nothing if there are no folios in the pagecache and will return quickly if there are no folios in the region specified. Further, move the WBC attachment above the flush call as the flush is going to attach a WBC and detach it again if it is not present - and since we need one anyway we might as well share it.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2024-36001

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2024-36001 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2024-36001

CVE-2024-36001 presents an accessible attack vector with minimal effort required. Restricting access controls and implementing security updates are critical to reducing exploitation risks.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2024-36001, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2024-36001, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2024-36001 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: High
    CVE-2024-36001 could allow unauthorized modifications to data, potentially affecting system reliability and trust.
  • Availability: High
    CVE-2024-36001 can disrupt system operations, potentially causing complete denial of service (DoS).

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.043% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 12.0% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 88.0% of others.

CVE-2024-36001 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-787

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.9:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2024-36001: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-62672 – rplay through 3.3.2 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (SIGSEGV and daemon crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact. This occurs...
  • CVE-2025-47410 – Apache Geode is vulnerable to CSRF attacks through GET requests to the Management and Monitoring REST API that could allow an attacker who has tric...
  • CVE-2025-11926 – The Related Posts Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 1...
  • CVE-2025-9890 – The Theme Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0. This is due to missing...
  • CVE-2025-5555 – A vulnerability has been found in Nixdorf Wincor PORT IO Driver up to 1.0.0.1. This affects the function sub_11100 in the library wnport.sys of the...