CVE-2024-26762 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2024-26762
Vulnerability Scoring

5.5
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2024-26762 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Local
    Vulnerability requires local system access.
  • Privileges Required: Low
    Some privileges are necessary to exploit the vulnerability.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2024-26762 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕓 18 Mar 2025, 16:13 UTC
Originally published on: 🕔 03 Apr 2024, 17:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 348 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVE-2024-26762 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2024-26762: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cxl/pci: Skip to handle RAS errors if CXL.mem device is detached The PCI AER model is an awkward fit for CXL error handling. While the expectation is that a PCI device can escalate to link reset to recover from an AER event, the same reset on CXL amounts to a surprise memory hotplug of massive amounts of memory. At present, the CXL error handler attempts some optimistic error handling to unbind the device from the cxl_mem driver after reaping some RAS register values. This results in a "hopeful" attempt to unplug the memory, but there is no guarantee that will succeed. A subsequent AER notification after the memdev unbind event can no longer assume the registers are mapped. Check for memdev bind before reaping status register values to avoid crashes of the form: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffa00000195e9100 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [...] RIP: 0010:__cxl_handle_ras+0x30/0x110 [cxl_core] [...] Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x24/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x82/0x160 ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x84/0x110 ? exc_page_fault+0x113/0x170 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? __pfx_dpc_reset_link+0x10/0x10 ? __cxl_handle_ras+0x30/0x110 [cxl_core] ? find_cxl_port+0x59/0x80 [cxl_core] cxl_handle_rp_ras+0xbc/0xd0 [cxl_core] cxl_error_detected+0x6c/0xf0 [cxl_core] report_error_detected+0xc7/0x1c0 pci_walk_bus+0x73/0x90 pcie_do_recovery+0x23f/0x330 Longer term, the unbind and PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT behavior might need to be replaced with a new PCI_ERS_RESULT_PANIC.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2024-26762

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2024-26762 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2024-26762

CVE-2024-26762 presents an accessible attack vector with minimal effort required. Restricting access controls and implementing security updates are critical to reducing exploitation risks.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2024-26762, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2024-26762, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2024-26762 has no significant impact on data confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2024-26762 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: High
    CVE-2024-26762 can disrupt system operations, potentially causing complete denial of service (DoS).

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.043% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 12.0% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 88.0% of others.

CVE-2024-26762 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

NVD-CWE-noinfo

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2024-26762: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-3275 – The Themesflat Addons For Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the TF E Slider widget in all versions up...
  • CVE-2025-1457 – The Element Pack Addons for Elementor – Free Templates and Widgets for Your WordPress Websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-S...
  • CVE-2025-1093 – The AIHub theme for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the generate_image function in all ver...
  • CVE-2025-3284 – The User Registration & Membership – Custom Registration Form, Login Form, and User Profile plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Reques...
  • CVE-2025-3278 – The UrbanGo Membership plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in versions up to, and including, 1.0.4. This is due to the plugi...