CVE-2023-54206 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2023-54206
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

Attack Complexity:
Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
Attack Vector:
Attack Vector Under Analysis
Privileges Required: None
No authentication is required for exploitation.
Scope:
Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
User Interaction: None
No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2023-54206 Details

Status: Awaiting Analysis

Last updated: 🕣 31 Dec 2025, 20:43 UTC
Originally published on: 🕐 30 Dec 2025, 13:16 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 1 days

CVSS Release:

CVE-2023-54206 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2023-54206: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: flower: fix filter idr initialization The cited commit moved idr initialization too early in fl_change() which allows concurrent users to access the filter that is still being initialized and is in inconsistent state, which, in turn, can cause NULL pointer dereference [0]. Since there is no obvious way to fix the ordering without reverting the whole cited commit, alternative approach taken to first insert NULL pointer into idr in order to allocate the handle but still cause fl_get() to return NULL and prevent concurrent users from seeing the filter while providing miss-to-action infrastructure with valid handle id early in fl_change(). [ 152.434728] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN [ 152.436163] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] [ 152.437269] CPU: 4 PID: 3877 Comm: tc Not tainted 6.3.0-rc4+ #5 [ 152.438110] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 152.439644] RIP: 0010:fl_dump_key+0x8b/0x1d10 [cls_flower] [ 152.440461] Code: 01 f2 02 f2 c7 40 08 04 f2 04 f2 c7 40 0c 04 f3 f3 f3 65 48 8b 04 25 28 00 00 00 48 89 84 24 00 01 00 00 48 89 c8 48 c1 e8 03 <0f> b6 04 10 84 c0 74 08 3c 03 0f 8e 98 19 00 00 8b 13 85 d2 74 57 [ 152.442885] RSP: 0018:ffff88817a28f158 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 152.443851] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 152.444826] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffffff8500ae80 RDI: ffff88810a987900 [ 152.445791] RBP: ffff888179d88240 R08: ffff888179d8845c R09: ffff888179d88240 [ 152.446780] R10: ffffed102f451e48 R11: 00000000fffffff2 R12: ffff88810a987900 [ 152.447741] R13: ffffffff8500ae80 R14: ffff88810a987900 R15: ffff888149b3c738 [ 152.448756] FS: 00007f5eb2a34800(0000) GS:ffff88881ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 152.449888] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 152.450685] CR2: 000000000046ad19 CR3: 000000010b0bd006 CR4: 0000000000370ea0 [ 152.451641] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 152.452628] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 152.453588] Call Trace: [ 152.454032] <TASK> [ 152.454447] ? netlink_sendmsg+0x7a1/0xcb0 [ 152.455109] ? sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 [ 152.455689] ? ____sys_sendmsg+0x535/0x6b0 [ 152.456320] ? ___sys_sendmsg+0xeb/0x170 [ 152.456916] ? do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 [ 152.457529] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 [ 152.458321] ? ___sys_sendmsg+0xeb/0x170 [ 152.458958] ? __sys_sendmsg+0xb5/0x140 [ 152.459564] ? do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 [ 152.460122] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 [ 152.460852] ? fl_dump_key_options.part.0+0xea0/0xea0 [cls_flower] [ 152.461710] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x7a/0xd0 [ 152.462299] ? _raw_read_lock_irq+0x30/0x30 [ 152.462924] ? nla_put+0x15e/0x1c0 [ 152.463480] fl_dump+0x228/0x650 [cls_flower] [ 152.464112] ? fl_tmplt_dump+0x210/0x210 [cls_flower] [ 152.464854] ? __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1a7/0x330 [ 152.465592] ? nla_put+0x15e/0x1c0 [ 152.466160] tcf_fill_node+0x515/0x9a0 [ 152.466766] ? tc_setup_offload_action+0xf0/0xf0 [ 152.467463] ? __alloc_skb+0x13c/0x2a0 [ 152.468067] ? __build_skb_around+0x330/0x330 [ 152.468814] ? fl_get+0x107/0x1a0 [cls_flower] [ 152.469503] tc_del_tfilter+0x718/0x1330 [ 152.470115] ? is_bpf_text_address+0xa/0x20 [ 152.470765] ? tc_ctl_chain+0xee0/0xee0 [ 152.471335] ? __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30 [ 152.471948] ? unwind_get_return_address+0x56/0xa0 [ 152.472639] ? __thaw_task+0x150/0x150 [ 152.473218] ? arch_stack_walk+0x98/0xf0 [ 152.473839] ? __stack_depot_save+0x35/0x4c0 [ 152.474501] ? stack_trace_save+0x91/0xc0 [ 152.475119] ? security_capable+0x51/0x90 [ 152.475741] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2c1/0x9d0 [ 152.476387] ? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x2b0/0x2b0 [ 152.477042] ---truncated---

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2023-54206

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2023-54206 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2023-54206

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2023-54206.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2023-54206, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2023-54206, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

Confidentiality: None
CVE-2023-54206 does not compromise confidentiality.
Integrity: None
CVE-2023-54206 does not impact data integrity.
Availability: None
CVE-2023-54206 does not affect system availability.

CVE-2023-54206 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2023-54206: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-23039 – In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/gud: fix NULL fb and crtc dereferences on USB disconnect On disconnect dr...
CVE-2026-23038 – In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pnfs/flexfiles: Fix memory leak in nfs4_ff_alloc_deviceid_node() In nfs4_ff_a...
CVE-2026-23037 – In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: etas_es58x: allow partial RX URB allocation to succeed When es58x_alloc_...
CVE-2026-23036 – In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: release path before iget_failed() in btrfs_read_locked_inode() In btrf...
CVE-2026-23035 – In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Pass netdev to mlx5e_destroy_netdev instead of priv mlx5e_priv is ...