CVE-2023-52487
Vulnerability Scoring
Security assessments indicate that CVE-2023-52487 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.
Security assessments indicate that CVE-2023-52487 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.
Status: Analyzed
Last updated: 🕠 12 Dec 2024, 17:31 UTC
Originally published on: 🕕 11 Mar 2024, 18:15 UTC
Time between publication and last update: 275 days
CVSS Release: version 3
nvd@nist.gov
Primary
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVE-2023-52487: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Fix peer flow lists handling The cited change refactored mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peer_flow() to only clear DUP flag when list of peer flows has become empty. However, if any concurrent user holds a reference to a peer flow (for example, the neighbor update workqueue task is updating peer flow's parent encap entry concurrently), then the flow will not be removed from the peer list and, consecutively, DUP flag will remain set. Since mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peers_flow() calls mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peer_flow() for every possible peer index the algorithm will try to remove the flow from eswitch instances that it has never peered with causing either NULL pointer dereference when trying to remove the flow peer list head of peer_index that was never initialized or a warning if the list debug config is enabled[0]. Fix the issue by always removing the peer flow from the list even when not releasing the last reference to it. [0]: [ 3102.985806] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3102.986223] list_del corruption, ffff888139110698->next is NULL [ 3102.986757] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 22109 at lib/list_debug.c:53 __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0 [ 3102.987561] Modules linked in: act_ct nf_flow_table bonding act_tunnel_key act_mirred act_skbedit vxlan cls_matchall nfnetlink_cttimeout act_gact cls_flower sch_ingress mlx5_vdpa vringh vhost_iotlb vdpa openvswitch nsh xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink iptable_nat xt_addrtype xt_conntrack nf_nat br_netfilter rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcg ss oid_registry overlay rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm mlx5_ib ib_uverbs ib_core mlx5_core [last unloaded: bonding] [ 3102.991113] CPU: 2 PID: 22109 Comm: revalidator28 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc6+ #3 [ 3102.991695] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 3102.992605] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0 [ 3102.993122] Code: 39 c2 74 56 48 8b 32 48 39 fe 75 62 48 8b 51 08 48 39 f2 75 73 b8 01 00 00 00 c3 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 48 fd 0a 82 e8 41 0b ad ff <0f> 0b 31 c0 c3 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 70 fd 0a 82 e8 2d 0b ad ff 0f 0b [ 3102.994615] RSP: 0018:ffff8881383e7710 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 3102.995078] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 3102.995670] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff88885f89b640 RDI: ffff88885f89b640 [ 3102.997188] DEL flow 00000000be367878 on port 0 [ 3102.998594] RBP: dead000000000122 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c0000000ffffdfff [ 3102.999604] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: ffff8881383e7598 R12: dead000000000100 [ 3103.000198] R13: 0000000000000002 R14: ffff888139110000 R15: ffff888101901240 [ 3103.000790] FS: 00007f424cde4700(0000) GS:ffff88885f880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 3103.001486] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 3103.001986] CR2: 00007fd42e8dcb70 CR3: 000000011e68a003 CR4: 0000000000370ea0 [ 3103.002596] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 3103.003190] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 3103.003787] Call Trace: [ 3103.004055] <TASK> [ 3103.004297] ? __warn+0x7d/0x130 [ 3103.004623] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0 [ 3103.005094] ? report_bug+0xf1/0x1c0 [ 3103.005439] ? console_unlock+0x4a/0xd0 [ 3103.005806] ? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70 [ 3103.006149] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 [ 3103.006531] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [ 3103.007430] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x4f/0xc0 [ 3103.007910] mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_peers_flow+0xcf/0x240 [mlx5_core] [ 3103.008463] mlx5e_tc_del_flow+0x46/0x270 [mlx5_core] [ 3103.008944] mlx5e_flow_put+0x26/0x50 [mlx5_core] [ 3103.009401] mlx5e_delete_flower+0x25f/0x380 [mlx5_core] [ 3103.009901] tc_setup_cb_destroy+0xab/0x180 [ 3103.010292] fl_hw_destroy_filter+0x99/0xc0 [cls_flower] [ 3103.010779] __fl_delete+0x2d4/0x2f0 [cls_flower] [ 3103.0 ---truncated---
The exploitability of CVE-2023-52487 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).
CVE-2023-52487 presents an accessible attack vector with minimal effort required. Restricting access controls and implementing security updates are critical to reducing exploitation risks.
A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.
Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.
Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.
Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2023-52487, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.
Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2023-52487, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.
The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.
EPSS Score: 0.042% (probability of exploit)
EPSS Percentile: 5.02%
(lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 94.98% of others.
Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.