CVE-2022-49624 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2022-49624
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

Attack Complexity:
Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
Attack Vector:
Attack Vector Under Analysis
Privileges Required: None
No authentication is required for exploitation.
Scope:
Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
User Interaction: None
No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2022-49624 Details

Status: Received on 26 Feb 2025, 07:01 UTC

Published on: 26 Feb 2025, 07:01 UTC

CVSS Release:

CVE-2022-49624 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2022-49624: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: atlantic: remove aq_nic_deinit() when resume aq_nic_deinit() has been called while suspending, so we don't have to call it again on resume. Actually, call it again leads to another hang issue when resuming from S3. Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992345] Call Trace: Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992346] <TASK> Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992348] aq_nic_deinit+0xb4/0xd0 [atlantic] Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992356] aq_pm_thaw+0x7f/0x100 [atlantic] Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992362] pci_pm_resume+0x5c/0x90 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992366] ? pci_pm_thaw+0x80/0x80 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992368] dpm_run_callback+0x4e/0x120 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992371] device_resume+0xad/0x200 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992373] async_resume+0x1e/0x40 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992374] async_run_entry_fn+0x33/0x120 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992377] process_one_work+0x220/0x3c0 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992380] worker_thread+0x4d/0x3f0 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992382] ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992384] kthread+0x12a/0x150 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992386] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992387] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992391] </TASK> Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992392] ---[ end trace 1ec8c79604ed5e0d ]--- Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992394] PM: dpm_run_callback(): pci_pm_resume+0x0/0x90 returns -110 Jul 8 03:09:44 u-Precision-7865-Tower kernel: [ 5910.992397] atlantic 0000:02:00.0: PM: failed to resume async: error -110

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2022-49624

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2022-49624 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2022-49624

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2022-49624.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2022-49624, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2022-49624, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

Confidentiality: None
CVE-2022-49624 does not compromise confidentiality.
Integrity: None
CVE-2022-49624 does not impact data integrity.
Availability: None
CVE-2022-49624 does not affect system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.045% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 18.4% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 81.6% of others.

CVE-2022-49624 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2022-49624: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-2578 – The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar – Amelia plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, a...
CVE-2025-2074 – The Advanced Google reCAPTCHA plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the ‘sSearch’ parameter in all versions up to, and in...
CVE-2025-2485 – The Drag and Drop Multiple File Upload for Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and inc...
CVE-2025-2328 – The Drag and Drop Multiple File Upload for Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file pa...
CVE-2025-31335 – The OpenSAML C++ library before 3.3.1 allows forging of signed SAML messages via parameter manipulation (when using SAML bindings that rely on non-...