CVE-2022-48664 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2022-48664
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

Attack Complexity:
Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
Attack Vector:
Attack Vector Under Analysis
Privileges Required: None
No authentication is required for exploitation.
Scope:
Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
User Interaction: None
No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2022-48664 Details

Status: Awaiting Analysis

Last updated: 🕢 21 Nov 2024, 07:33 UTC
Originally published on: 🕐 28 Apr 2024, 13:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 206 days

CVSS Release:

CVE-2022-48664 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2022-48664: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix hang during unmount when stopping a space reclaim worker Often when running generic/562 from fstests we can hang during unmount, resulting in a trace like this: Sep 07 11:52:00 debian9 unknown: run fstests generic/562 at 2022-09-07 11:52:00 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: INFO: task umount:49438 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: Not tainted 6.0.0-rc2-btrfs-next-122 #1 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: task:umount state:D stack: 0 pid:49438 ppid: 25683 flags:0x00004000 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: Call Trace: Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: <TASK> Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: __schedule+0x3c8/0xec0 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: schedule+0x5d/0xf0 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: schedule_timeout+0xf1/0x130 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? lock_acquired+0x1a0/0x420 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x2c/0xd0 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: __wait_for_common+0xac/0x200 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? usleep_range_state+0xb0/0xb0 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: __flush_work+0x26d/0x530 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs+0x140/0x140 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? trace_clock_local+0xc/0x30 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: __cancel_work_timer+0x11f/0x1b0 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? close_ctree+0x12b/0x5b3 [btrfs] Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? __trace_bputs+0x10b/0x170 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: close_ctree+0x152/0x5b3 [btrfs] Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: ? evict_inodes+0x166/0x1c0 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: generic_shutdown_super+0x71/0x120 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: deactivate_locked_super+0x2e/0xa0 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: cleanup_mnt+0x100/0x160 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: task_work_run+0x59/0xa0 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1a6/0x1b0 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x40 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: do_syscall_64+0x48/0x90 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7fcde59a57a7 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffe914217c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007fcde5ae8264 RCX: 00007fcde59a57a7 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000055b57556cdd0 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: RBP: 000055b57556cba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe91420570 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: R13: 000055b57556cdd0 R14: 000055b57556ccb8 R15: 0000000000000000 Sep 07 11:55:32 debian9 kernel: </TASK> What happens is the following: 1) The cleaner kthread tries to start a transaction to delete an unused block group, but the metadata reservation can not be satisfied right away, so a reservation ticket is created and it starts the async metadata reclaim task (fs_info->async_reclaim_work); 2) Writeback for all the filler inodes with an i_size of 2K starts (generic/562 creates a lot of 2K files with the goal of filling metadata space). We try to create an inline extent for them, but we fail when trying to insert the inline extent with -ENOSPC (at cow_file_range_inline()) - since this is not critical, we fallback to non-inline mode (back to cow_file_range()), reserve extents ---truncated---

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2022-48664

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2022-48664 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2022-48664

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2022-48664.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2022-48664, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2022-48664, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

Confidentiality: None
CVE-2022-48664 does not compromise confidentiality.
Integrity: None
CVE-2022-48664 does not impact data integrity.
Availability: None
CVE-2022-48664 does not affect system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.045% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 18.4% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 81.6% of others.

CVE-2022-48664 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2022-48664: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-31203 – An integer overflow was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.4, tvOS 18.4, iPadOS 17.7.6, macOS Sonoma...
CVE-2025-31202 – A null pointer dereference was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4, tvOS ...
CVE-2025-31197 – The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.4, tvOS 18.4, macOS Ventura 13.7.5, iPadOS 17.7.6, macOS Sono...
CVE-2025-30445 – A type confusion issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.4, tvOS 18.4, macOS Ventura 13.7.5, iPadOS 17.7....
CVE-2025-24271 – An access issue was addressed with improved access restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.4, tvOS 18.4, macOS Ventura 13.7.5, iPadOS...