CVE-2022-48633 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2022-48633
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

Attack Complexity:
Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
Attack Vector:
Attack Vector Under Analysis
Privileges Required: None
No authentication is required for exploitation.
Scope:
Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
User Interaction: None
No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2022-48633 Details

Status: Awaiting Analysis

Last updated: 🕢 21 Nov 2024, 07:33 UTC
Originally published on: 🕐 28 Apr 2024, 13:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 206 days

CVSS Release:

CVE-2022-48633 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2022-48633: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/gma500: Fix WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock) error psb_gem_unpin() calls dma_resv_lock() but the underlying ww_mutex gets destroyed by drm_gem_object_release() move the drm_gem_object_release() call in psb_gem_free_object() to after the unpin to fix the below warning: [ 79.693962] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 79.693992] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock) [ 79.694015] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 240 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:582 __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x569/0xfb0 [ 79.694052] Modules linked in: rfcomm snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer qrtr bnep ath9k ath9k_common ath9k_hw snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic ledtrig_audio snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_intel ath3k snd_intel_dspcfg mac80211 snd_intel_sdw_acpi btusb snd_hda_codec btrtl btbcm btintel btmtk bluetooth at24 snd_hda_core snd_hwdep uvcvideo snd_seq libarc4 videobuf2_vmalloc ath videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common snd_seq_device videodev acer_wmi intel_powerclamp coretemp mc snd_pcm joydev sparse_keymap ecdh_generic pcspkr wmi_bmof cfg80211 i2c_i801 i2c_smbus snd_timer snd r8169 rfkill lpc_ich soundcore acpi_cpufreq zram rtsx_pci_sdmmc mmc_core serio_raw rtsx_pci gma500_gfx(E) video wmi ip6_tables ip_tables i2c_dev fuse [ 79.694436] CPU: 0 PID: 240 Comm: plymouthd Tainted: G W E 6.0.0-rc3+ #490 [ 79.694457] Hardware name: Packard Bell dot s/SJE01_CT, BIOS V1.10 07/23/2013 [ 79.694469] RIP: 0010:__ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x569/0xfb0 [ 79.694496] Code: ff 85 c0 0f 84 15 fb ff ff 8b 05 ca 3c 11 01 85 c0 0f 85 07 fb ff ff 48 c7 c6 30 cb 84 aa 48 c7 c7 a3 e1 82 aa e8 ac 29 f8 ff <0f> 0b e9 ed fa ff ff e8 5b 83 8a ff 85 c0 74 10 44 8b 0d 98 3c 11 [ 79.694513] RSP: 0018:ffffad1dc048bbe0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 79.694623] RAX: 0000000000000028 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 79.694636] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffaa8b0ffc RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 79.694650] RBP: ffffad1dc048bc80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffad1dc048ba90 [ 79.694662] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffaad62fe8 R12: ffff9ff302103138 [ 79.694675] R13: ffff9ff306ec8000 R14: ffff9ff307779078 R15: ffff9ff3014c0270 [ 79.694690] FS: 00007ff1cccf1740(0000) GS:ffff9ff3bc200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 79.694705] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 79.694719] CR2: 0000559ecbcb4420 CR3: 0000000013210000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [ 79.694734] Call Trace: [ 79.694749] <TASK> [ 79.694761] ? __schedule+0x47f/0x1670 [ 79.694796] ? psb_gem_unpin+0x27/0x1a0 [gma500_gfx] [ 79.694830] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe3/0x140 [ 79.694864] ? ww_mutex_lock+0x38/0xa0 [ 79.694885] ? __cond_resched+0x1c/0x30 [ 79.694902] ww_mutex_lock+0x38/0xa0 [ 79.694925] psb_gem_unpin+0x27/0x1a0 [gma500_gfx] [ 79.694964] psb_gem_unpin+0x199/0x1a0 [gma500_gfx] [ 79.694996] drm_gem_object_release_handle+0x50/0x60 [ 79.695020] ? drm_gem_object_handle_put_unlocked+0xf0/0xf0 [ 79.695042] idr_for_each+0x4b/0xb0 [ 79.695066] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x60 [ 79.695095] drm_gem_release+0x1c/0x30 [ 79.695118] drm_file_free.part.0+0x1ea/0x260 [ 79.695150] drm_release+0x6a/0x120 [ 79.695175] __fput+0x9f/0x260 [ 79.695203] task_work_run+0x59/0xa0 [ 79.695227] do_exit+0x387/0xbe0 [ 79.695250] ? seqcount_lockdep_reader_access.constprop.0+0x82/0x90 [ 79.695275] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [ 79.695304] do_group_exit+0x33/0xb0 [ 79.695331] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x14/0x20 [ 79.695353] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80 [ 79.695376] ? up_read+0x17/0x20 [ 79.695401] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe3/0x140 [ 79.695429] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 [ 79.695450] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [ 79.695473] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 79.695493] RIP: 0033:0x7ff1ccefe3f1 [ 79.695516] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x7ff1ccefe3c7. [ 79.695607] RSP: 002b:00007ffed4413378 EFLAGS: ---truncated---

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2022-48633

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2022-48633 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2022-48633

No exploitability data is available for CVE-2022-48633.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2022-48633, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2022-48633, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

Confidentiality: None
CVE-2022-48633 does not compromise confidentiality.
Integrity: None
CVE-2022-48633 does not impact data integrity.
Availability: None
CVE-2022-48633 does not affect system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.043% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 12.0% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 88.0% of others.

CVE-2022-48633 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2022-48633: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-4770 – A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in PHPGurukul Park Ticketing Management System 2.0. This issue affects some unkno...
CVE-2025-4769 – A vulnerability classified as critical was found in CBEWIN Anytxt Searcher 1.3.1128.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file ATServic...
CVE-2025-40632 – Cross-site scripting (XSS) in Icewarp Mail Server affecting version 11.4.0. This vulnerability allows an attacker to modify the “lastLogin” cookie ...
CVE-2025-40631 – HTTP host header injection vulnerability in Icewarp Mail Server affecting version 11.4.0. By modifying the Host header and adding a payload, arbitr...
CVE-2025-40630 – Open redirection vulnerability in IceWarp Mail Server affecting version 11.4.0. This vulnerability allows an attacker to redirect a user to any dom...